Obama And "Gender Identity Expression" (Cross Dressing etc)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: AAjax
Originally posted by: manowar821
Here's the key moment, butterfuck. Ask yourself, does this hurt anyone? Or is it just a matter of whether or not to deny THEM rights? Them meaning cross-dressers.

Chill out, the name calling thing in such terms is against p/n rules.

you need to chill dude!!
I think it`s funny the way the guy nailed the dudes name!!

Ah you'll be part of the team soon
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,227
36
91
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Im sure women will LOVE that dudes in chick clothes would be protected. I cant wait until the first fetish porn site guy puts on a dress and ransacks women's bathrooms.

Some people are sick.

OH NO!!

Think of all of the gender neutral restrooms that Europe has had for years and that US colleges are adopting being utilized by BOTH...men and women!

Your Puritanical morals aside, this is already happening and there is not only no uproar about it, but an actual embracing of it in most cultures.


I found one of the first ones ladies......be careful for this guy wearing a skirt trying to see you drop a deuce.
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Butterbean making a thread bashing gays and lesbians and Obama at the same time?

Say it say so joe, gosh gee, what will all those hockey moms and joe sixpacks do with a government that recognizes even more minorities! :laugh:

If Obama is going to have central planks that include forcing homosexuality and cross-dressing etc into schools, military and business then it is of course open to debate and criticism. It's just the agenda driven lock-ups that want to silence the majority of people and use ridicule to try as do so.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Butterbean

I have a business - why should I have to make provisions (under threat of law) for someones
disorder

I am confused. What provisions are you required to make with this?
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: jman19
More butterball hate speech... surprise, surprise :roll:


"Normal" can feel like injustice to people who are against it. You would like to pretend the Emperor isn't naked and hate those who don't go along - all while accusing other people of your own corruptions. Snap out of it please.
 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: jman19
More butterball hate speech... surprise, surprise :roll:


"Normal" can feel like injustice to people who are against it. You would like to pretend the Emperor isn't naked and hate those who don't go along - all while accusing other people of your own corruptions. Snap out of it please.

The war of northern aggression is over, you lost whitey.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,431
6,089
126
Can you imagine old Wide Stance reaching under the stall and feeling a girl's leg. The guy could have died on the spot. Clearly this law would be terrible.
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: BigDH01
Originally posted by: Butterbean
BO would elevate a disorder to a protected status and force employers and schools to jump through very bizarre hoops ( its no wonder jobs go to China with junk like this)

You really have no understanding of economics. Nothing will prevent our jobs from going to labor rich countries in low trade barrier environments. Everyone one of us could be a "Butterbean" (God help us) and we'd still lose all labor intensive jobs that are geographically independent.

I suggest you begin with this.

Maybe you can learn something instead of regurgitating whatever you see on Fox News.

Too many stupid regulations drive people away. A lot of NY's stock market action went to London because of such things. Talk about not understanding economics..
 

thirtythree

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2001
8,680
3
0
There's no evidence that this is referring to cross-dressers specifically (e.g., regular old males who like to wear women's clothing). With a lot of transgender individuals, it would be more awkward for them to use the "correct" bathroom, because for all intents and purposes, they are the gender they assume. Cross-dressers wouldn't want to use the wrong restroom because they identify with their biological gender.

EDIT: Nor is there any evidence that this is referring to issues like which restroom to use. It sounds more like discrimination when hiring someone.
EDIT2: Plus, gay and lesbians already share a restroom with people they're attracted to. Are you proposing we quit allowing them to? Should we start coming up with more restrooms. Maybe 4 or 6 different varieties?
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Im sure women will LOVE that dudes in chick clothes would be protected. I cant wait until the first fetish porn site guy puts on a dress and ransacks women's bathrooms.

Some people are sick.

OH NO!!

Think of all of the gender neutral restrooms that Europe has had for years and that US colleges are adopting being utilized by BOTH...men and women!

Your Puritanical morals aside, this is already happening and there is not only no uproar about it, but an actual embracing of it in most cultures.

Don't equate lack of coverage in the media with lack of outrage. Smart people know how this works now. We also know how once this stuff get is under the door a lot more insanity starts to flow because the people at war with reality need to always be on the attack to keep up seeming like down and vice versa. If people can't be sensible citizens they just lower the bar until they are "normal" and everyone else is an "oppressor". Of course the media is not run by normal people in large part

Kinky Details of CNN Anchor's Central Park Arrest
http://gothamist.com/2008/04/19/kinky_details_o.php
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,431
6,089
126
Nobody can be so obsessed by the sexual perversion of others who doesn't have sexual perversion burned into his brain.

You call yourself normal, Butterbean, but you are not normal at all. You are absolutely lit up by this topic. It is central to everything you express. You have and are possessed by obsession. You are confused by the fact that your motive is good with some other driving need that you feel. The racist wants to save us from the evil of the race he hates. The desire to save is good. But the hatred of the race and the learned assumptions that it is evil is where the mistake is made. Are you white? If so you can see the insanity of those who hate whites. You are just as insane but in a different way. You are like some loon who runs around screaming at every opportunity that white people are evil. A loon like that can even be white. In a country full of white hating people, hating whites isn't normal. It is a culturally passed on delusion. Normal is not being obsessed, not having some delusion you have to shout about every three minutes. You have a mental illness and can be cured, but your delusion has become part of your identity. You will die a kind of death if you let go. The death you face is learning how to really live, to be free of obsession. Good luck.
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Butterbean,

I'm really, truly trying to understand your positions on the topic of anything sexual. You seem to have the utter disdain for anything that isn't from the 16th century Church of England philosophy that quite frankly doesn't seem sane.

Please explain why this, homosexuality, public nudity at a designated location or any other sexual activity outside of the missionary position between a husband and wife (cause I'm absolutely positive you are against any out of wedlock sex also) is wrong or does you any harm whatsoever.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Butterbean,

I'm really, truly trying to understand your positions on the topic of anything sexual. You seem to have the utter disdain for anything that isn't from the 16th century Church of England philosophy that quite frankly doesn't seem sane.

Please explain why this, homosexuality, public nudity at a designated location or any other sexual activity outside of the missionary position between a husband and wife (cause I'm absolutely positive you are against any out of wedlock sex also) is wrong or does you any harm whatsoever.

It doesn't but he gets to troll and people respond with serious questions. I don't get it. If everyone just stopped responding, even in jest, he'd go away out of boredom.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,431
6,089
126
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Butterbean,

I'm really, truly trying to understand your positions on the topic of anything sexual. You seem to have the utter disdain for anything that isn't from the 16th century Church of England philosophy that quite frankly doesn't seem sane.

Please explain why this, homosexuality, public nudity at a designated location or any other sexual activity outside of the missionary position between a husband and wife (cause I'm absolutely positive you are against any out of wedlock sex also) is wrong or does you any harm whatsoever.

It doesn't but he gets to troll and people respond with serious questions. I don't get it. If everyone just stopped responding, even in jest, he'd go away out of boredom.

Why should he go away. Why should you not have an answer to his fanaticism. Where is your proof he's an insincere troll?
 

TheDoc9

Senior member
May 26, 2006
264
0
0
What we need is a third public restroom marked "tranny's".

The picture next to the door will be a large bold question mark symbol with a small man and woman symbol on both sides, so there's no confusion.


AT Disclaimer: This is an obvious joke, it has nothing to do with a lack of tolerance, understanding or respect for these people. Don't bother replying if you can't understand this.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,819
1,126
126
This guy is the result of what would happen if Zendari and Riprorin hooked up and had a kid.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,221
654
126
Originally posted by: umbrella39
This guy is the result of what would happen if Zendari and Riprorin hooked up and had a kid.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,052
30
86
Originally posted by: TheDoc9

What we need is a third public restroom marked "tranny's".

No. What we need is a public disposal system for homophobic bigots like Butt__Bean.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
I have no problems with tranny's in the workplace if they have no problem with me getting a good laugh until I get use to them.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,227
36
91
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I have no problems with tranny's in the workplace if they have no problem with me getting a good laugh until I get use to them.

Biggot. Laughing at people because they are different?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,431
6,089
126
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: TheDoc9

What we need is a third public restroom marked "tranny's".

No. What we need is a public disposal system for homophobic bigots like Butt__Bean.

Right, we need to bring Auschwitz back on line.