One article for you and you can continue your complete and total denial of reality. I rarely see any point in posting information or discussing anything because simpletons like yourself are unwavering in your devotion regardless of how much information is fed to you. So I will address your one point.
http://www.gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx
You remind me of my grandson the Christmas my wife put a small handheld video game in his stocking. The kind that costs a few bucks and takes AA batteries. He was maybe four years old. He pushed some buttons on it until he got it to make a noise and declared to us that "he won" and when questioned, he fully believed it. It was both funny and cute. When adults like yourself do it, it's neither funny or cute. It just is a display of ignorance.
Lastly, are you oldgamer? If not, who were you before you were banned?
LOL, yes, another delusional conservative accusing me of being a previously banned user. Keep it up.
Just because I make you feel inadequate enough to dodge the argument by touting how smart you are and how dumb I am, or how I just gotta be some other user doesn't make me a previously banned user, or a shill "second account".
Not that any of that matters in terms of the argument, delusional conservative.
Here's how you can tell that you're extremely bad at reading comprehension.
It doesn't matter whether you want to cry about U3 being used. U3 is lower now than when Bush left office. Period, end of story.
And of course, you ignore the other two arguments I said, because of course they are true.
Let me say that again. I am not making any qualitative argumentabout U3 being the most bestiest unemployment number.
I am not making any qualitative argument that unemployment is super awesome low and couldn't be better.
And because you have terrible reading comprehension, you've totally ignored what I said, because you're a conservative, so everything is the fault of the Kenyan Muslim Atheist Fascist Communist usurper.
Now, since you're clearly delusional and bad at logic, I'll save you some time.
Even if you look at U6 unemployment, the numbers are lower NOW, than when Bush II left office.
Meaning that unemployment. is. lower. now. then. when. BushII. was. in. office.
http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate_u6.jsp?fromYear=2009&toYear=2015
So, go ahead and keep trying to win an argument by ignoring what I said and then pointing at a squirrel.