Obama 15 points ahead

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,162
136
Text

:thumbsup:

Obama's current lead also reflects the large party-identification advantage the Democrats now enjoy?55 percent of all voters call themselves Democrats or say they lean toward the party while just 36 percent call themselves Republicans or lean that way.



 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Remember all the whining and threats from certain Clinton backers, saying they would consider voting McCain?

Turns out they were fringe after all.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
amazing news.

who would have imagined the democrat winning in the polls after 8 years of Bush.

oh wait, everyone. :p

polls are meaningless this far out, especially national ones.

the election is Obama's to lose, but in my wildest imagination, I can't see McCain scraping by with 36% of the vote.
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
It's Newsweek. Take a look at the samples for the poll - 38% D/23% R/35% I. With that kind of ridiculous polling sample, Obama should have a 15 point lead.

Rasmussen has the spread at 4. Gallup has it at two.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,092
53,443
136
Originally posted by: Queasy
It's Newsweek. Take a look at the samples for the poll - 38% D/23% R/35% I. With that kind of ridiculous polling sample, Obama should have a 15 point lead.

Rasmussen has the spread at 4. Gallup has it at two.

Pew Research puts the nationwide breakdown as 36% democrats, 27% republicans and 37% independent.

So, that sample seems pretty close on party ID to me, glad you think Obama should have such a large lead.
 

Stoneburner

Diamond Member
May 29, 2003
3,491
0
76
This is why there is a threat of a wipeout... some pollsters may be way too conservative considering the political climate. While this is an interesting poll, it's the state by state ones that concern me more.
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
And by how many points was Hillary ahead of Obama at the start of the Democratic primaries?
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Polls in June are teh useless. Lots of shit to smear from both sides before the Fall.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Poor McSame has to deal with that dead and stinking Albatross hanging around his neck called George Bush.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,958
9,041
136
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Poor McSame has to deal with that dead and stinking Albatross hanging around his neck called George Bush.

Not around his neck. McCain is the incarnation of everything wrong with Bush. He embraces those wrongs as a badge of honor.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
While I don't believe the true gap is as high as 15 percent, I think there IS a significant gap, and it will grow over time. When the dust settles I believe this election will be a Clinton-Bush-type gap, with Obama winning the popular vote by a significant percentage and absolutely drubbing McCain in the electoral vote. Mark my words and feel free to hold them against me if I'm wrong.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
While I don't believe the true gap is as high as 15 percent, I think there IS a significant gap, and it will grow over time. When the dust settles I believe this election will be a Clinton-Bush-type gap, with Obama winning the popular vote by a significant percentage and absolutely drubbing McCain in the electoral vote. Mark my words and feel free to hold them against me if I'm wrong.

I agree, completely. I'm surprised the Republicans are even running - what a waste of money.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Tab
I agree, completely. I'm surprised the Republicans are even running - what a waste of money.

Yeah, because we should just stick with one party. Why give folks a choice? :roll:

Not that I'm happy with the jokers the GOP have crowned or the general state of the party, but...
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Even as a partisan democrats, I will not allow my self to get too elated over one poll. Lots of future events will somewhat change the picture as 11/4/08 gets very near.

The problem for the GOP lies in the fact that all events and news will probably favor Obama and the democrats as GWB&co dangles slowly in the wind.

And the entire world eagerly awaits the coming 1/20/2009, when the hand of history, with one casual flick, pulls the toilet level, and the turd called GWB&co goes straight down the toilet.

The bleetings of Pabster are especially ironic with------Yeah, because we should just stick with one party. Why give folks a choice?

Which in itself is an entire denial of cause and effect. Pabster, the GOP will offer us a full slate of candidates in 11/08, its just the fact that the democrats will likely defeat the bulk of them BECAUSE THE GOP EARNED IT, not only with their stupid and arrogant behavior in the first six years of GWB, but they will double earn it due to their behavior after 2006.

Pabster, if you did not see this GOP train wreck coming years ago, its too late for you to either rehabilitate your credibility or save the GOP.

The GOP forgot to deliver the positive results and in fact have no one to blame but themselves, end of story. The GOP thought political and military power would trump results, it never has and never will.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Stoneburner
This is why there is a threat of a wipeout... some pollsters may be way too conservative considering the political climate. While this is an interesting poll, it's the state by state ones that concern me more.

Good point, with the *winner-take-all* method of the electorial college system, state polls are what matter (just like a state's votes). E.g., losing CA & NY by .01% or 100% changes nothing for McCain in the EC, but sure makes the popular vote look a lot different.

Fern
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Polls don't mean shit right now...and might not mean shit even on election night.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: tvarad
And by how many points was Hillary ahead of Obama at the start of the Democratic primaries?

Wasn't Kerry up by 8 points in the summer of 2004?
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
On June 21 1988 Dukakis had a 12 point lead over Bush.
Of course Dukakis ended up losing by 8 points, a twenty point swing.

Now I doubt Obama suffers the same fate, but you never know.

The one thing Obama and Dukakis have in common is that they were both relatively unknowns running for President for the first time.

Obama does have a huge advantage in that people see the country going in the wrong direction, while in 98 they saw it going in the right direction.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Engineer
Polls don't mean shit right now...and might not mean shit even on election night.

Yep, polling is very dependent on methodology and sample - thus they will never be as accurate as some people want them to be.