- Oct 9, 1999
- 72,636
- 46
- 91
Originally posted by: smp
<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge target=blank href="http://www.technoa.co.kr/notes/latestnews/2002/11/04/v/06_s.jpg">OMG :Q</A>
NV30ÀÇ Àç¹ÌÀÖ´Â ¿ä¼Ò2. NV30Àº 1¾ï2500¸¸°³ÀÇ Æ®·£Áö½ºÅ͸¦ °¡Áö°í Àִµ¥ ÀÌ´Â
NV30Àº Çö GeForce4ÀÇ 2¹èÀÌ»óÀÇ ¼º´ÉÀ» º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¿µ»ó°ú ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°¡´É¼ºµµ ³ô¿©ÁØ´Ù.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Originally posted by: smp
<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge target=blank href="http://www.technoa.co.kr/notes/latestnews/2002/11/04/v/06_s.jpg">OMG :Q</A>
I thought the point of .13mu design was a cooler running chip?
I thought the point of .13mu design was a cooler running chip?
Nice to know that:
NV30ÀÇ Àç¹ÌÀÖ´Â ¿ä¼Ò2. NV30Àº 1¾ï2500¸¸°³ÀÇ Æ®·£Áö½ºÅ͸¦ °¡Áö°í Àִµ¥ ÀÌ´Â
and most importantly:
NV30Àº Çö GeForce4ÀÇ 2¹èÀÌ»óÀÇ ¼º´ÉÀ» º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¿µ»ó°ú ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°¡´É¼ºµµ ³ô¿©ÁØ´Ù.
Haahaa...
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I may be eating my words in a few weeks, but looking at this presentation slide from nVidia, I think those of you who truly think that NV30 will destroy R300 in every area will be disappointed. R300 is up to 300% faster than a Ti4600 in some areas, and nVidia is only predicting NV30 will be 2x faster than a Ti4600.
I actually feel sorry for nVidia. There is really little they can do to live up to the hype we've created for their next product. ATi just might have pulled a rabbit out of its hat with R300.
Originally posted by: Dug
I never knew floating point calculations (something that can't be seen) could be converted into distance.
Anybody got the conversion for that?