• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nvidia gts450 benchmarks leaked

Phynaz said:
A dual heat pipe cooler for less than 5770 performance? I'll pass, thanks.
Click to expand...

Do you realize that is the ASUS card that is factory clocked to 925MHz, right? And that it is just as fast if not faster in most cases? In some cases by quite a large margin?

If that's the reference cooler that likely means the GTS450 is going to be a beast overclocker and/or run extremely cool/quiet.

I'd love to see 5750 numbers because IIRC the 5750 isn't too much slower than the 5770, I don't think the stock GTS450 is going to be much faster.

At any rate I want to see overclock vs. overclock for all models.
 
Wreckage said:
That's for the ASUS model that was faster than a 5770.
Click to expand...

A highly over clocked model that barely edges out a stock 5770. No thanks, unless its priced according to the competition(Which is highly unlikely considering factory OC'ed cards demand some premium)
 
No power consumption graphs.. bleh! That is not the ref cooler, I believe this is.

http://gpudesign.bafree.net/nvidia-gts-450-gf106-pictured-benchmarked as mentioned by the same site that snagged the review before whatever site did it took it down.

Here's a sum up!

http://gpudesign.bafree.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Summary.pnghttp://gpudesign.bafree.net/nvidia-gts-450-gf106-pictured-benchmarked

Asus OC GTS 450 gets beaten by stock 5770 after averaging all the benchmarks? Who'd thought.

Who knows what pricing will be in the wild, especially given what's coming up shortly.
 
yasasvy said:
A highly over clocked model that barely edges out a stock 5770. No thanks, unless its priced according to the competition(Which is highly unlikely considering factory OC'ed cards demand some premium)
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's a big :thumbsdown: for nVidia, an overclocked card that barely edges the old ass HD 5770 at stock speed, pitiful, with newer games probably the performance gap will close somewhat (Specially if the weak Fermi TMU's are the same used on the GTS 450). And now that the HD 6x00 series is around the corner, it makes the GTS 450 far less relevant than already is. But at least if its priced competitively, AMD could drop the prices of the HD 5770 to clear inventory and compete with it. (Which somehow I doubt 🙁 ) Greedy AMD!
 
Sind said:
You created this thread right? Did you not read the thread at XS fully or even bother to read the benchmarks?

All this is, is some rip from a review that was up for a couple hours apparently before the NDA police swooped in and made it disappear, there is no commentary only graphs. Have fun!

http://gpudesign.bafree.net/asus-gts-450-top-full-review
Click to expand...

The benchmarks I linked shows the Asus card beating the 5770 by a good margin and the stock card losing to the 5770.
Are we on the same page?
 
Woof that card isn't that impressive. Why is it taking so long to bring out these watered down cards?

If rumors are right next month we'll see the 67xx and it should handily beat this. Who would recommend this to someone with that around the corner?

Buy it, use it, save receipt, return before 30 days.
 
happy medium said:
The benchmarks I linked shows the Asus card beating the 5770 by a good margin and the stock card losing to the 5770.
Are we on the same page?
Click to expand...

Yeah but can't you see that it seems like you're tying to push an overclocked version of the GTS450 as if thats the standard, when its quite apparent that the 5770 > GTS450.

What we need to see is an average overclock 5770 vs. an average overclock GTS450.

Right now a stock GTS450 can't really compete with a stock 5770, and an overclocked GTS450, while faster than a 5770, can't compete with a 768MB GTX460. We still need more information and also to see how prices shake down.

At first glance it really doesn't appear to be good news for nVidia; AMD's early experience with 40nm and GDDR5 seems to have given them an edge nVidia couldn't overcome in one generation.

railven said:
Woof that card isn't that impressive. Why is it taking so long to bring out these watered down cards?

If rumors are right next month we'll see the 67xx and it should handily beat this. Who would recommend this to someone with that around the corner?

Buy it, use it, save receipt, return before 30 days.
Click to expand...

Because the 6700 seems to be positioning itself as a mainstream enthusiast part, potentially performing on par with the 5800s and replacing them entirely, as opposed to a general mainstream part like the 5700s and now the GTS450.
 
Last edited:
My math sucks, but thats an 18% OC right?

Im sure even an OC 5750 would be faster. Happy, is that the highest you got out of your 5750?
 
Its generally thought to be between an HD 5750 and HD 5770 both in performance and price. If thats the case I don't see how its such a big "fail" for Nvidia until ATI either comes out with something new in that price range with substantially better performance or drops the price of its two cards. Until there's a proper review or two we're all just pulling unsubstantiated speculation out of our asses anyway.
 
Leyawiin said:
Its generally thought to be between an HD 5750 and HD 5770 both in performance and price. If thats the case I don't see how its such a big "fail" for Nvidia until ATI either comes out with something new in that price range with substantially better performance or drops the price of its two cards. Until there's a proper review or two we're all just pulling unsubstantiated speculation out of our asses anyway.
Click to expand...

Well, it's 11 months later, and doesn't seem to manage to match it in stock configuration. Some might consider that a fail. And apparently it uses more power too, although we shall have to see.
If the rumours of new ATI products coming "soon" are true, then that would definitely make it a fail.
 
Skurge said:
My math sucks, but thats an 18% OC right?

Im sure even an OC 5750 would be faster. Happy, is that the highest you got out of your 5750?
Click to expand...

That is the highest overclock one can achieve without a volt mod.(overclocking using overdrive)
 
bunnyfubbles said:
Because the 6700 seems to be positioning itself as a mainstream enthusiast part, potentially performing on par with the 5800s and replacing them entirely, as opposed to a general mainstream part like the 5700s and now the GTS450.
Click to expand...

How much are the 67xx entering the market at? I'd assume still sub $200.

Unless they'll be in the $200+ range then I can understand your comment.

Even if the 6770 enters at $200, I'd peg the 6750 around $160.

If the GTS 450 enters around $130-140, at least in my eyes I know which I'd prefer.

Heck I'd guess even the 65xx series would out perform the GTS 450. This card just seems too late and pointless at this now.
 
6770 looks to enter ~ $239 according to some marketing slides that were put up here the other day. based on that I'd expect performance somewhere btwn gtx 460 1gb and 5850, but we shall see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top