- May 7, 2005
- 5,161
- 32
- 86
Originally posted by: compgeek89
Looks just like 6800 GT/U specs, Im wondering what the point is in releasing it.
Just to use failed GT/GTX chips I suppose.
Originally posted by: compgeek89
Looks just like 6800 GT/U specs, Im wondering what the point is in releasing it.
Just to use failed GT/GTX chips I suppose.
Originally posted by: Rage187
if it comes out at $150-$200 I'm buying one.
Originally posted by: DidlySquat
not that I care cause I already have the top dog 7800GTX. woot!
Originally posted by: compgeek89
Looks just like 6800 GT/U specs, Im wondering what the point is in releasing it.
Just to use failed GT/GTX chips I suppose.
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
the 7800Nu will probably be the same if not faster than the 6800U. afterall the pipelines are more efficient. and of course theres now going to be TSAA.
it'll run cooler and quieter than the 6800U, and probably OC further so i think its worth having. specialy for people who wanna move up from 9800's and 6600's
Originally posted by: compgeek89
Looks just like 6800 GT/U specs, Im wondering what the point is in releasing it.
Just to use failed GT/GTX chips I suppose.
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
I wander how much power the R520s consume plus its power consumption.
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: compgeek89
Looks just like 6800 GT/U specs, Im wondering what the point is in releasing it.
Just to use failed GT/GTX chips I suppose.
I think it's because companies DO annoying things like this!!!
Radeon 8500 -> Radeon 9100... same thing
GeForce4 MX 420,440 -> GeForce2... same thing
there are probably more!

 
				
		