Originally posted by: akugami
Pure speculation but this visit by nVidia's CEO to TSMC can, IMHO, mean one of two things. The first is TSMC has fixed the issue with yields but nVidia's GT300 are of such large size that they're going to run into problems with pricing their cards competitively with ATI's cards. The discussion will indeed be about contract prices as nVidia attempts to lower them to stay competitive. The second is that TSMC still has problems with yields regardless of what they claim and nVidia's CEO is coming to personally bitch at them (TSMC). We'll likely have a better guess after the next financial report from both ATI and nVidia as well as look at availability of their upcoming cards.
Wouldn't you find it odd, disappointing in fact, as a shareholder or financial analyst if NV's CEO wasn't doing those things (cost reduction efforts in essence) regardless of the reality with ATI or the yields at TSMC or the size of their next-gen chip?
I expect Jensen to be routinely crying poor to Morris Chang, October is nothing special in this regard.
I expect Jensen to be routinely engaged with cost reduction activities to better position themselves in pricing to maximize margins, regardless ATI's release schedule of next-gen chips.
I expect Jensen to be routinely engaged with the foundries doing what he can to push on their yield-enhancement efforts.
Of what I saw internally at TI (which isn't to say I saw the whole picture either) of our CEO Rich Templeton engaging with the foundries, as well as SUN's CEO Scott McNealy engaging with us at TI (we were their foundry up thru 65nm) the outlined activities of Jensen is just routine monthly meetings and business as usual for a guy in that position in this industry.
Again what baffles me here is not that Jensen is doing any of these things, its that him doing any of these
routine things has somehow become news fodder. Next up "zomg Jensen just took a dookie guys! :shocked: and get this, he used a TOILET in the process, WTF right!? This
totally has to be in response to ATI or yield issues at TSMC, no...other...explaination...possible...".