I for one dont care, nvidia and ati could put hacks in 3dmark to give you a score of 1,000,000,000. still would not bother me as long as REAL game ran well on either card.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
What's more interesting is how the fx5900 scores drop so fast for "real" games when run on custom timedemos and flybys instead of the standard ones nvidia was expecting reviewers to use.
True, but it's still sad to see how badly my favorite GPU company has stumbled -- "Say it ain't so, Joe!"Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
What's more interesting is how the fx5900 scores drop so fast for "real" games when run on custom timedemos and flybys instead of the standard ones nvidia was expecting reviewers to use.
and the sun looks just same, history has not changed, and the games still run great on the geforce line and the radeon line
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
True, but it's still sad to see how badly my favorite GPU company has stumbled -- "Say it ain't so, Joe!"
<-- using a Geforce3 now, a Geforce2 before that
NVIDIA AND ATI CAUGHT CHEATING
but who can blame Mr. ATI for not resisting Dawn and DuskOriginally posted by: rbV5
NVIDIA AND ATI CAUGHT CHEATING
Mrs. ATI isn't going to like that, not one bit:evil:
No kidding, she wasn't such a biAtch when nobody paid ol' Mr. ATI a second look, now he's geting popular with the ladies...nag,nag,nag.but who can blame Mr. ATI for not resisting Dawn and Dusk
Originally posted by: onza
wait a sec, i'm gana go photoshop my scores so its l33t.