• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

NV owns the fastest computer in the world title

Read about this at a couple different news sites. It has 7200 -448 core Nvidia gpu's. Plus 14000 intel cpu's. WoW !
 
Nvidia doesnt own the fastest computer. As i have read in different articles. China has the fastest computer in world and it was built using nvidia graphics card.

"On Thursday the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) in China revealed its improved supercomputer called Tianhe-1A that achieves peak performance of 2.5PetaFLOPS as measured by the LINPACK benchmark. The system is the fastest in China and in the world at the moment. What is noteworthy is that Nvidia Corp.'s Tesla powers the new supercomputer"
 
Last edited:
The thread name should be the fastest computer in the world is built based on nvidia gpu
 
Last edited:
Chine like using GPUs for their supercomputers. The last one they had used a load of 4870X2s.
 
But can it run Crysis 2? 😉

Also, it's Tesla not Tesler.

ok, corrected. I bet it can even run Crysis 3 ;]

Nvidia doesnt own the fastest computer. As i have read in different articles. China has the fastest computer in world and it was built using nvidia graphics card.

"On Thursday the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) in China revealed its improved supercomputer called Tianhe-1A that achieves peak performance of 2.5PetaFLOPS as measured by the LINPACK benchmark. The system is the fastest in China and in the world at the moment. What is noteworthy is that Nvidia Corp.'s Tesla powers the new supercomputer"

no NV doesn't own the supercomputer, they rarely do. But they now own the _title_ of fastest super computer made using their Tesla chips.
 
Last edited:
I assume this is the fastest computer known to the public. I don't want to turn this into P&N, but countries like the US, and other sub-superpowers would not disclose where their supercomputers and databases are located and what kind of hardware they contain.

So yeah, this is the fastest publicly known supercomputer.
 
I assume this is the fastest computer known to the public. I don't want to turn this into P&N, but countries like the US, and other sub-superpowers would not disclose where their supercomputers and databases are located and what kind of hardware they contain.

So yeah, this is the fastest publicly known supercomputer.

Not to mention that that over half of all super computers are in the United States... The latest list has USA owning 56% of the pie...
 
Lets see how this super duper China owned NV powerhouse runs without 14,000 intel cpus that are doing nothing anyway. Intel just riding on NVs coat tails
 
I assume this is the fastest computer known to the public. I don't want to turn this into P&N, but countries like the US, and other sub-superpowers would not disclose where their supercomputers and databases are located and what kind of hardware they contain.

So yeah, this is the fastest publicly known supercomputer.

Ya this thing was already in P&N . Because the OP wanted to blame bush for chinas sudden lead . I pointed out to him we haven't a clue what our military has.
 
Lets see how this super duper China owned NV powerhouse runs without 14,000 intel cpus that are doing nothing anyway. Intel just riding on NVs coat tails

Nvidia answers some of your questions over at their blog.
http://blogs.nvidia.com/nTersect/

This week was a momentous one in the world of supercomputing.
Today in Beijing, the Tianjin Supercomputing Center revealed details of Tianhe-1A system – a new GPU-enabled supercomputer that delivers 2.5 petaflops of performance – that’s 2,500 trillion (2,500,000,000,000,000) floating point operations per second - the equivalent of 175,000 laptops!
If you tried to build a system capable of this level of performance using just CPUs, you’d need more than 50,000 of them, consuming 12 megawatts of power. Instead, the system uses a “heterogeneous” model – massively parallel GPUs and multi-core CPUs – to deliver more performance, more efficiently. The system uses both Tesla GPUs along with CPUs and, thanks to this design, Tianhe-1A consumes only 4 megawatts, making it 3 times more power efficient than a CPU-only machine. The power saved by using GPUs is enough to power your home for 8000 years! Give or take.


You GO Nvidia- FTW
 
Am I the only one that thinks that the faster supercomputers in the world are never published due to the fact that they are probably used for military applications?
 
considering crysis might switch to console only or nvidia physX, crysis 3 might actually look worse than crysis 1. Fable 2, for example, looks a lot worse on the xbox (for which it is exclusive) than fable 1 did on the PC.
 
Since the chances for Crysis X running under Linux are extremely slim, I take that bet every day. You don't think that thing runs under Windows do you? 😉

they probably dual boot into windows to play Crysis X when they not super computing.
 
they probably dual boot into windows to play Crysis X when they not super computing.
If there only were a win version that supported more than 1k cores 😉

Scholzpdx said:
DX9 can be used under WINE now IIRC. I bet it's possible.
Crysis 2 will be DX9? Ok that's disappointing, but even in that case I doubt it'll work without problems out of the box, especially on SLES or another linux server variant. Though I haven't tried that (you usually SSH into such servers so you'd have to install lots of other stuff), who knows? 😀
 
Crysis 2 will be DX9?

there are a lot of conflicting rumors... some say console exclusive, some say will replace crytek physics engine with nvidia physX... some say the above are not true. There are multiple conflicting rumors so its hard to tell.
 
Am I the only one that thinks that the faster supercomputers in the world are never published due to the fact that they are probably used for military applications?

But the Chinese comp is undoubtedly for military application as well, since it at the national DEFENSE university.

I guess the governments could be hiding many more supercomps, but I don't really see the point. These are not that difficult to make, and single computers like this seem almost as much for bragging rights as for anything else. Also, I would think the amount of total military research would depend more on the combined computing speed of all your computers rather than one or two really fast ones. So if we had 20 "regular" supercomputers, I'm sure all the work that needs to be done will get finished efficiently enough.

What this shows however is the progress China is making, coming from out of nowhere basically. They interviewed some guy in those articles about the "milky way" computer in Tianjin, who said one of its key components is a Chinese proprietary interconnect which is twice as fast as the ones typically used in US supercomputers. That's a fairly innovative bit of technology as the power of the supercomputer not only depends on how many processors you use, it also depends on the speed of the interconnects which link up those processors as well as the software controlling the whole shebang.

So it's a three pronged beast, and while China has already mastered two of the three (inerconnect, software). The same guy interviewed (some supercomputer expert from tenessee where the american supercomp center is) also said that China is developing its own CHIPS for their next supercomputers, due out within the next 2 years, which he expects to be world class.

If they are coming up with chips like that, I think Intel and NVidia needs to be worried about more than AMD ...
 
I really noy interested in this class of computing much . So I don't know the ans to this question.

Take a Intel based 1 cpu 2 gf100
take an amd based 1 cpu 2 gf100

run cuda computing are the result the same .
Link
 
Back
Top