Nuclear Bomb Simulator

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
224
106
I can't get a bomb big enough to reach me..so I suppose that's a good thing. :p
 

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: CadetLee
I can't get a bomb big enough to reach me..so I suppose that's a good thing. :p

Did you enter your lattitude and logitude?
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,673
13,398
136
also dont forget that the values are in kilotons, so a megaton a 10 megaton bomb would be 10,000 kilotons.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,888
48,666
136
"No other effects, such as thermal damage or fallout levels, are included in this tool"

The thermal/radiation effects from a multi-megaton nuclear detonation are quite important IMO. The themal radiation itself can set fire to sructures/people far away from the pressure wave.
 

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: K1052
"No other effects, such as thermal damage or fallout levels, are included in this tool"

The thermal/radiation effects from a multi-megaton nuclear detonation are quite important IMO. The themal radiation itself can set fire to sructures/people far away from the pressure wave.

That would all depend on the weather of that day, it's really hard to predict what the true effects of that would be.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Originally posted by: Googer

That would all depend on the weather of that day, it's really hard to predict what the true effects of that would be.

Well one thing's for sure. It would be bad. :Q

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,547
20,262
146
It also makes no adjustment for geographical issues like mountains that would block shockwaves.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,888
48,666
136
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: K1052
"No other effects, such as thermal damage or fallout levels, are included in this tool"

The thermal/radiation effects from a multi-megaton nuclear detonation are quite important IMO. The themal radiation itself can set fire to sructures/people far away from the pressure wave.

That would all depend on the weather of that day, it's really hard to predict what the true effects of that would be.

Fallout would be problematic not knowing the weapon design, detonation altitude, etc..

I would think thermal/prompt radiation damage would be doable.
 

loic2003

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
3,844
0
0
FYI the North Korea test bomb was in the region of 500 Kilotonnes if you'd like to see what it could do.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,888
48,666
136
Originally posted by: loic2003
FYI the North Korea test bomb was in the region of 500 Kilotonnes if you'd like to see what it could do.

Differing reports at this time SK says 550 tons and the Russians say up to 15 kilotons
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
224
106
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: CadetLee
I can't get a bomb big enough to reach me..so I suppose that's a good thing. :p

Did you enter your lattitude and logitude?

No -- used Boston as the closest city. I doubt anybody would want to bother with northern NH. Hopefully not, anyway.
 

loic2003

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
3,844
0
0
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: loic2003
FYI the North Korea test bomb was in the region of 500 Kilotonnes if you'd like to see what it could do.

Differing reports at this time SK says 550 tons and the Russians say up to 15 kilotons

:eek: I meant 0.5Kt... sorry!
 

mwmorph

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2004
8,877
1
81
Hmm, i thought i live pretty close to DC, but it would take a bomb no one has to reach me. It would require about 15megatons to reach me at +1psi and maybe 10 megatons to get me at +.25psi and as of now, i dont think even the US or the old republics of the USSR have any in stock.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,888
48,666
136
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Hmm, i thought i live pretty close to DC, but it would take a bomb no one has to reach me. It would require about 15megatons to reach me at +1psi and maybe 10 megatons to get me at +.25psi and as of now, i dont think even the US or the old republics of the USSR have any in stock.

The Chinese ICBMs mount about a 10Mt single warhead.
 

mwmorph

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2004
8,877
1
81
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Hmm, i thought i live pretty close to DC, but it would take a bomb no one has to reach me. It would require about 15megatons to reach me at +1psi and maybe 10 megatons to get me at +.25psi and as of now, i dont think even the US or the old republics of the USSR have any in stock.

The Chinese ICBMs mount about a 10Mt single warhead.

you know ignorance is bliss right?

Anyway there is no reason for China to sell their nukes or to hate America(for now anyway). I think the chinese government is pretty stable, Uzbekistan or even Russia on the other hand...
 

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Hmm, i thought i live pretty close to DC, but it would take a bomb no one has to reach me. It would require about 15megatons to reach me at +1psi and maybe 10 megatons to get me at +.25psi and as of now, i dont think even the US or the old republics of the USSR have any in stock.

Russia has (or had) 50 Megaton and 100 Megaton warheads. The problem with the 100 Megaton bomb is that they did not have an airplane large enough to carry it.

The Russian AH-124 makes a Boeing 747 look like a baby Cessna and yet they could not fit a 100 Megaton Warhead in it.
http://www.raphoto.com/avbio01.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-124

And was later supplanted by the Antov 225 (still too small for a 100 Megaton Bomb)
http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=389
http://www.geocities.com/perry_peterson_1999/225d-large.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-225
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
MX Warhead - 300 KT

What the OP's article doesn't allude to is to 'stacking' or 'pancaking' - where a ground burst is topped
with a one mile high altitude burst - the 'cap' blows the ground burst back down and sideways, increasing the effect 100 fold.
It extends the affected zone around ground zero by more than 10 times the radius of a single warhead.

 

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
MX Warhead - 300 KT

What the OP's article doesn't allude to is to 'stacking' or 'pancaking' - where a ground burst is topped
with a one mile high altitude burst - the 'cap' blows the ground burst back down and sideways, increasing the effect 100 fold.
It extends the affected zone around ground zero by more than 10 times the radius of a single warhead.

Al Qaeda probably does not have ICBMs so that kind of an attack is most likely a fear of the past.