Nuclear and/or biological attack "likely" by 2013....

KDOG

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,525
14
81
Yes I know its a foxnews link, but its on other sources as well. I knew this was coming. As crazy as it sounds to talk about, I'd rather have the nuke than a biological attack..... I just hope its not both. I don't think it will even take them (whoever "them" is) five years. I think we'll have a major attack in 2 - 3yrs tops. I have a survivalist mentality that other people think is weird but when it hits the fan, I bet they'll have a different tune. And the weak leadership we'll have here soon won't be able to handle it at all in my opinion. I wonder if we'll be able to blame Obama for it like everyone blames Bush for everything. Him and his jerk-off administration will probably want to negotiate with the terrorist and make concessions for supposed "peace". Anyway, whats your thoughts on the impending doom?
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Like we haven't heard this before. If I told you $200 barrel oil was coming, but never gave a date and every time I did but it kept coming, what would that say about me?

Anyway, I will say that I would never live in a large city like NYC or Chicago. I have zero fear of ever being hit by a terrorist attack or even knowing anybody that is and had no problem getting on a plane soon after 911, but I belive that living in an exceptionally densely populated places with very fews ins/outs such as Manhattan island is literally just tempting fate. It is _clearly_ the place that would be hit if terrorist ever get a nuclear weapon or dirty bomb and I wouldn't want to be there for when it happens.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: KDOG
I wonder if we'll be able to blame Obama for it like everyone blames Bush for everything.

Him and his jerk-off administration will probably want to negotiate with the terrorist and make concessions for supposed "peace".

Anyway, whats your thoughts on the impending doom?

The "impending doom" was brought on by your hero Bush, not Obama.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
We've had weak leadership the last 8 years including the biggest terrorist attack in U.S. history. I don't think anyone is fooled into thinking we'll get worse in that regard, we've seen the bottom of the barrel on that front.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
86,586
52,324
136
Originally posted by: KDOG
Yes I know its a foxnews link, but its on other sources as well. I knew this was coming. As crazy as it sounds to talk about, I'd rather have the nuke than a biological attack..... I just hope its not both. I don't think it will even take them (whoever "them" is) five years. I think we'll have a major attack in 2 - 3yrs tops. I have a survivalist mentality that other people think is weird but when it hits the fan, I bet they'll have a different tune. And the weak leadership we'll have here soon won't be able to handle it at all in my opinion. I wonder if we'll be able to blame Obama for it like everyone blames Bush for everything. Him and his jerk-off administration will probably want to negotiate with the terrorist and make concessions for supposed "peace". Anyway, whats your thoughts on the impending doom?

I think that you should stop and think about why you're calling his administration weak and a 'jerk-off' administration before it's spent even one day in office, already forecasting doom and gloom based off of some nebulous article that is telling us the exact same thing that we've been hearing steadily since September 12th, 2001.

After that I'd be interested to hear if you think you are viewing this issue rationally and objectively. If you think you are, what do you think should be done in order to avert or mitigate this? What steps or policy positions does Obama have (or do you believe him to have) that will harm our efforts to do so?
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Evan
We've had weak leadership the last 8 years including the biggest terrorist attack in U.S. history. I don't think anyone is fooled into thinking we'll get worse in that regard, we've seen the bottom of the barrel on that front.
It requires suspension of sanity to think the leadership could do anything but get better, but it's certainly reasonable, I believe, to envision another large attack on the US at some point.
 

KDOG

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,525
14
81
I guess I have to spell it out. My personal beliefs are that Obama and his team (I mean c'mon - Hillary? Biden? pffft!) will be ultra-weak and wimpy in the face of a large attack. I see them going hat in hand to our enemies begging for mercy and giving them what they want. Yes, they haven't spent a day in office, but thats what I think of them. 'nuff said.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
36
91
Go to bed, people. You are safe. Jihadis are just a big boogey man that were invented by GWB, Diebold, and Blackwater. You have nothing to fear in life. Everyone loves you. The Clippers are going to win the title this year.



 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: KDOG
Yes I know its a foxnews link, but its on other sources as well. I knew this was coming. As crazy as it sounds to talk about, I'd rather have the nuke than a biological attack..... I just hope its not both. I don't think it will even take them (whoever "them" is) five years. I think we'll have a major attack in 2 - 3yrs tops. I have a survivalist mentality that other people think is weird but when it hits the fan, I bet they'll have a different tune. And the weak leadership we'll have here soon won't be able to handle it at all in my opinion. I wonder if we'll be able to blame Obama for it like everyone blames Bush for everything. Him and his jerk-off administration will probably want to negotiate with the terrorist and make concessions for supposed "peace". Anyway, whats your thoughts on the impending doom?

Marginalized.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
67
91
I'm only surprised that nothing happened from 2004-2008.

Something will probably happen within the first 6 months of Obama's presidency. It's the only reason that I am reluctant to invest my money anywhere. Being downwind of NYC also scares me.
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
When the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit. The blind are the American people who as recent polls showed, they didn't know what they were voting for. Those blind people are now leading the world, good luck, we'll need it.
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
Fact: We will sooner or later have another attack, and nothing we do will be able to prevent it. You can stop some, but sooner or later, you won't.

Fact: Terrorism has been around for thousands of years, and despite Bush declaring a war on an idea, it won't ever go away.

Fact: You are still more likely to die from a car accident, cancer, heart attack, or stroke then a terrorist attack.

Anyone want to stop driving their car and start eating healthy?
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
67
91
KDOG,

Alot of people blame Bush because he persents himself as dim-witted and obvious to that is going on around him. Good leadership is leadership that instills confidence. Thank God we have Obama. When something does happen atleast he will provide the confidence hte docile masses will require.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
86,586
52,324
136
Originally posted by: KDOG
I guess I have to spell it out. My personal beliefs are that Obama and his team (I mean c'mon - Hillary? Biden? pffft!) will be ultra-weak and wimpy in the face of a large attack. I see them going hat in hand to our enemies begging for mercy and giving them what they want. Yes, they haven't spent a day in office, but thats what I think of them. 'nuff said.

So what exactly are you expecting people to say to this?

You have a baseless negative opinion of an administration that hasn't spent a day in office and are attacking them based on a hypothetical situation. Would you like someone to make a baseless positive statement back about your made up situation so you can fight with them? Then they would be doing something just as dumb as you are.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: KDOG
I wonder if we'll be able to blame Obama for it like everyone blames Bush for everything.

Him and his jerk-off administration will probably want to negotiate with the terrorist and make concessions for supposed "peace".

Anyway, whats your thoughts on the impending doom?

The "impending doom" was brought on by your hero Bush, not Obama.

How then would you explain the many dozens of other attacks on America(ns) before Bush then since the 80's? Hmmm?
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
I think its reasonable, and probable, there WILL be another attack on direct US soil...I mean, it's happened many times before 9/11. They just get bigger and bigger. To blame a president for a terrorist attack like this is asinine. It's because we are AMERICA they attack us. We were called Satan long before GWB came into office.
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
If only we had spent the last five years actually fighting the organization that perpetrated the 9/11 attacks... the likelihood of another domestic attack would probably be much smaller. All that time and money pissed away in Iraq...
 

cliftonite

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2001
6,899
63
91
Originally posted by: KDOG
I guess I have to spell it out. My personal beliefs are that Obama and his team (I mean c'mon - Hillary? Biden? pffft!) will be ultra-weak and wimpy in the face of a large attack. I see them going hat in hand to our enemies begging for mercy and giving them what they want. Yes, they haven't spent a day in office, but thats what I think of them. 'nuff said.

What is this based on?
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: winnar111
The coming Obama Presidency certainly makes this likely.

So the president is responsible when the US gets attacked then. Gotcha, though I don't agree with you. Bush was not at all responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Hell, only a scant handful of hard left leaning posters here would agree with you on that. Welcome to that exclusive club. You have become what you despise. Congrats.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
The coming Obama Presidency certainly makes this likely.

The election is over, superfly...save your slime material for 2012...God knows you people will need it.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: KDOG
I guess I have to spell it out. My personal beliefs are that Obama and his team (I mean c'mon - Hillary? Biden? pffft!) will be ultra-weak and wimpy in the face of a large attack. I see them going hat in hand to our enemies begging for mercy and giving them what they want. Yes, they haven't spent a day in office, but thats what I think of them. 'nuff said.

Obama will be a war president. Probally a bigger war President than Bush. You havn't really studied the man if you think hes afraid of war.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Go to bed, people. You are safe. Jihadis are just a big boogey man that were invented by GWB, Diebold, and Blackwater. You have nothing to fear in life. Everyone loves you. The Clippers are going to win the title this year.

I sleep in the closet with 3 loaded guns beside me (in case the first two jam) with a perfect LOS of the door and the window, all the safetys are off. I feel safe now.


(Though I will say, people who think Bush started this are pretty ignorant, especially since "Islamic terrorism" has been on the CIA watchlist since a little before the Afghan/Soviet war. I just think your fear mongering though)