N NikPreviousAcct No Lifer Aug 15, 2000 52,763 1 0 Mar 1, 2002 #5 << << reeeeeepost >> post count +1 >> Post count + 1 + 1 nik
D DanFungus Diamond Member Jul 27, 2001 5,857 0 0 Mar 1, 2002 #12 WOAH! I hadn't seen that before, and that's really cool!
killface Golden Member Aug 17, 2001 1,416 0 0 Mar 1, 2002 #13 << Whhhhhhhheeeeeeeennnnnnnn????????? >> Heeeeerre
B b0mbrman Lifer Jun 1, 2001 29,470 1 81 Mar 1, 2002 #14 << Another Clock Viper GTS >> Oh...now that's awesome...
N notfred Lifer Feb 12, 2001 38,241 4 0 Mar 1, 2002 #15 That's pretty pointless. The "human clock" thing is much more interesting.
B b0mbrman Lifer Jun 1, 2001 29,470 1 81 Mar 1, 2002 #16 << That's pretty pointless. The "human clock" thing is much more interesting. >> Yeah...12 x 60 = 720 pictures he had to take
<< That's pretty pointless. The "human clock" thing is much more interesting. >> Yeah...12 x 60 = 720 pictures he had to take
Y yakko Lifer Apr 18, 2000 25,455 2 0 Mar 2, 2002 #18 << << That's pretty pointless. The "human clock" thing is much more interesting. >> Yeah...12 x 60 = 720 pictures he had to take >> Actually he has different ones for am and pm.
<< << That's pretty pointless. The "human clock" thing is much more interesting. >> Yeah...12 x 60 = 720 pictures he had to take >> Actually he has different ones for am and pm.
W woolmilk Member Dec 9, 2001 120 0 0 Mar 2, 2002 #21 <<Yeah...12 x 60 = 720 pictures he had to take >> and theres an analog and a digital clock (that dude has curious pants )
<<Yeah...12 x 60 = 720 pictures he had to take >> and theres an analog and a digital clock (that dude has curious pants )
Snapster Diamond Member Oct 14, 2001 3,916 0 0 Mar 2, 2002 #23 Must have missed this one first time round. Though, the human clock is definitely better.......more interesting.
Must have missed this one first time round. Though, the human clock is definitely better.......more interesting.