AnitaPeterson
Diamond Member
I don't know if this is real or not (i.e. the director asking people how come thay got a copy of his crappy straight-to-video film), but the reactions are pretty hilarious...
http://imdb.com/title/tt0449077/board/nest/31570430
And BTW, don't lose your time on this lame movie...
PS:
Here's the thread, for those who didn't sign up for IMDB:
"Board: The Net 2.0 (2006)
View: thread | flat | inline | nest
Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - Iuliu (Thu Dec 15 2005 03:19:03 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
I've just started watching this movie and it really sucks. About 10 mins into it you can really tell it's not worth watching. I downloaded a high-quality DVD-rip.
The acting is lame, the script is childish and very lame... it all has a very unprofessional and unconvincing feel to it.
Just do not buy it, for all means!
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - the_american_bad_ass (Thu Dec 15 2005 20:20:43 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
Same here, i dl this piece of trash, it's not even a movie!
They should pay us to watch mediocrity like this!!
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - pcy70 (Sat Dec 17 2005 03:42:53 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Sat Dec 17 2005 06:22:01
Yep. The leading actress acts very fake. She looks way to standard-hollywood-normal-pretty-girl.
The dialog is childish and very predictable. I've heard it to many times in other B-movies.
After 10 minutes I stopped watching. I haven't got time for this.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - kok_warlock (Mon Dec 19 2005 05:03:15 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
I can't believe i watched this crap till the end, if there was at least some nudity to say it wasn't a complete waste of time, but no, it was a complete waste of time.
--
"They say that "evil prevails when good men fail to act". It should be "evil prevails"."
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - KateEdwards (Tue Dec 20 2005 01:45:31 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
Sucks worst than Pauly Shore, waste of a 700mb download. Don't download this piece *beep*
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - mansspams (Tue Dec 20 2005 07:47:00 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
I cannot agree more!
[Post deleted]
This message has been deleted by an administrator
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - cdw322 (Wed Dec 21 2005 23:52:51 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
How is this even possible? I don't even have a copy of the finished film...and I driected it! It's not due to hit the street until Feb! Please tell me how you found it. CDW322@aol.com
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - hero_antagonist (Thu Dec 22 2005 12:58:25 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
Hope you didn?t like that email address. Who would admit to that and invite the non stop hate mail that disclosing responsibility for making this pile? Look welcome to the age of the all powerful dork. We have copies and you don?t because we OWN the friking internet. And we all have day jobs. Some within your production crew, or in the lab that develops your film or transfers you DV. The best is when you send us Screener copies! Then you?re just a win Rip away from instant internet distribution. Look if it makes you feel any better, you can stop viewing this as piracy. Look at it this way we wouldn?t buy this tripe of a movie if we only had that option. We would be reading books if it wisent for the p2p tools we have, like we did for decades b4 the new forms of media cropped up. So it?s not like your losing money, well maybe a lil, there was no money there to begin with. If you lose anything its the two weeks of distribution time b4 word of mouth gits around that your movie is hated by your target audience, a small window where movies like this used to make there money. Well them day IS ova. I guess you?ll have to go back to the drawing bored and try to fig out a diff way to make a living. Sry.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - MobiusM1 (Sat Jan 7 2006 17:38:02 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
got news for you, Mr. Antagonist, you don't own jack.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - stoicmt (Fri Dec 30 2005 06:11:04 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
there's this thing called bittorrent...
and this other thing called unscrupulous employees.
sorry mate.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - petegould-1 (Mon Jan 2 2006 19:22:53 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Mon Jan 2 2006 19:24:16
cdw said
How is this even possible? I don't even have a copy of the finished film...and I driected it! It's not due to hit the street until Feb! Please tell me how you found it. CDW322@aol.com
is this one of those trick questions 🙂
if you did direct this film shame on you
[Post deleted]
UPDATED Thu Jan 5 2006 06:29:11
This message has been deleted by an administrator
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - dunctait (Thu Jan 5 2006 15:07:08 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
downloading isnt that dangerous.
telling people (including the director) that you downloaded it, might be asking for trouble tho. i mean people admit to downloading al the time but if youre gonna rub in their face they might get mad.
p.s this is the funniest thread ive ever seen
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - scorpian90 (Thu Jan 5 2006 16:36:53 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
The film didn't come out yet. WTF?
Re: ==== FUNNIEST THREAD EVAR ====
by - MobiusM1 (Sat Jan 7 2006 17:34:41 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Sat Jan 7 2006 18:43:05
>>"downloading isnt that dangerous. "<<
Tell that to all the users and software developers who get their arses sued into the ground each year by the RIAA/MPAA.
It's apparently dangerous to some people... like the people who lose half their brains in the process of mindlessly downloading videos, reducing them to a state of obtusity in which they actually post on IMDB that they've downloaded some unreleased movie and thought it sucked.
I mean seriously... few questions for them:
=1= How did you get your hands on an unreleased film?
=2= Why are you posting about it here?
=3= How do you know that it is in fact the film _The Net 2.0_ if nobody's seen it legitimately?
=4= Why the <****> are you posting about it here?
=5= Did it ever occur to you that maybe the MPAA is just getting an early start at napster bombing crappy films in place of a pending release?
=6= Why the <****> did you think, of all things, that posting about it here was a good idea?
=7= Did it ever occur to you that maybe the MPAA owns your dumb arse?
Re: ==== FUNNIEST THREAD EVAR ====
by - the_american_bad_ass (Sat Jan 7 2006 18:32:10 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Sat Jan 7 2006 18:32:40
unreleased?
The movie is out since a couple of months and I own the original. Say what you want but it is released!!
cdw322 is just a liar!!
Re: ==== FUNNIEST THREAD EVAR ====
by - MobiusM1 (Sat Jan 7 2006 18:39:37 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
cdw322 may be a liar, but this film has _not_ yet seen its release date.
I've had the unfortunate experience of renting the original myself.
Re: ==== FUNNIEST THREAD EVAR ====
by - dunctait 4 days ago (Tue Jan 10 2006 10:45:50 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
i dunno, i know on imdb you get a lot of trolls claiming to be famous but this guy has ome credibility. first the guy hes *pretending* to be isnt that famous. he registered with the username that happens to be the directors initials months ago, and this is his first post.
anyway im a fan of hacker movies etc (not that i particularly like them, i just try to watch a lot of them) and i noticed the Net 2.0 was on torrents mid-december.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - gilnor83 5 days ago (Mon Jan 9 2006 12:11:09 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Mon Jan 9 2006 12:12:01
This movie has not been released on DVD but it's available all over the net, I have the movie too, in which decade you live? 1920?? Mobius m1, you really seems to be one heck on an annoying person!
"
http://imdb.com/title/tt0449077/board/nest/31570430
And BTW, don't lose your time on this lame movie...
PS:
Here's the thread, for those who didn't sign up for IMDB:
"Board: The Net 2.0 (2006)
View: thread | flat | inline | nest
Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - Iuliu (Thu Dec 15 2005 03:19:03 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
I've just started watching this movie and it really sucks. About 10 mins into it you can really tell it's not worth watching. I downloaded a high-quality DVD-rip.
The acting is lame, the script is childish and very lame... it all has a very unprofessional and unconvincing feel to it.
Just do not buy it, for all means!
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - the_american_bad_ass (Thu Dec 15 2005 20:20:43 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
Same here, i dl this piece of trash, it's not even a movie!
They should pay us to watch mediocrity like this!!
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - pcy70 (Sat Dec 17 2005 03:42:53 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Sat Dec 17 2005 06:22:01
Yep. The leading actress acts very fake. She looks way to standard-hollywood-normal-pretty-girl.
The dialog is childish and very predictable. I've heard it to many times in other B-movies.
After 10 minutes I stopped watching. I haven't got time for this.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - kok_warlock (Mon Dec 19 2005 05:03:15 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
I can't believe i watched this crap till the end, if there was at least some nudity to say it wasn't a complete waste of time, but no, it was a complete waste of time.
--
"They say that "evil prevails when good men fail to act". It should be "evil prevails"."
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - KateEdwards (Tue Dec 20 2005 01:45:31 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
Sucks worst than Pauly Shore, waste of a 700mb download. Don't download this piece *beep*
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - mansspams (Tue Dec 20 2005 07:47:00 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
I cannot agree more!
[Post deleted]
This message has been deleted by an administrator
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - cdw322 (Wed Dec 21 2005 23:52:51 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
How is this even possible? I don't even have a copy of the finished film...and I driected it! It's not due to hit the street until Feb! Please tell me how you found it. CDW322@aol.com
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - hero_antagonist (Thu Dec 22 2005 12:58:25 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
Hope you didn?t like that email address. Who would admit to that and invite the non stop hate mail that disclosing responsibility for making this pile? Look welcome to the age of the all powerful dork. We have copies and you don?t because we OWN the friking internet. And we all have day jobs. Some within your production crew, or in the lab that develops your film or transfers you DV. The best is when you send us Screener copies! Then you?re just a win Rip away from instant internet distribution. Look if it makes you feel any better, you can stop viewing this as piracy. Look at it this way we wouldn?t buy this tripe of a movie if we only had that option. We would be reading books if it wisent for the p2p tools we have, like we did for decades b4 the new forms of media cropped up. So it?s not like your losing money, well maybe a lil, there was no money there to begin with. If you lose anything its the two weeks of distribution time b4 word of mouth gits around that your movie is hated by your target audience, a small window where movies like this used to make there money. Well them day IS ova. I guess you?ll have to go back to the drawing bored and try to fig out a diff way to make a living. Sry.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - MobiusM1 (Sat Jan 7 2006 17:38:02 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
got news for you, Mr. Antagonist, you don't own jack.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - stoicmt (Fri Dec 30 2005 06:11:04 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
there's this thing called bittorrent...
and this other thing called unscrupulous employees.
sorry mate.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - petegould-1 (Mon Jan 2 2006 19:22:53 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Mon Jan 2 2006 19:24:16
cdw said
How is this even possible? I don't even have a copy of the finished film...and I driected it! It's not due to hit the street until Feb! Please tell me how you found it. CDW322@aol.com
is this one of those trick questions 🙂
if you did direct this film shame on you
[Post deleted]
UPDATED Thu Jan 5 2006 06:29:11
This message has been deleted by an administrator
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - dunctait (Thu Jan 5 2006 15:07:08 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
downloading isnt that dangerous.
telling people (including the director) that you downloaded it, might be asking for trouble tho. i mean people admit to downloading al the time but if youre gonna rub in their face they might get mad.
p.s this is the funniest thread ive ever seen
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - scorpian90 (Thu Jan 5 2006 16:36:53 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
The film didn't come out yet. WTF?
Re: ==== FUNNIEST THREAD EVAR ====
by - MobiusM1 (Sat Jan 7 2006 17:34:41 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Sat Jan 7 2006 18:43:05
>>"downloading isnt that dangerous. "<<
Tell that to all the users and software developers who get their arses sued into the ground each year by the RIAA/MPAA.
It's apparently dangerous to some people... like the people who lose half their brains in the process of mindlessly downloading videos, reducing them to a state of obtusity in which they actually post on IMDB that they've downloaded some unreleased movie and thought it sucked.
I mean seriously... few questions for them:
=1= How did you get your hands on an unreleased film?
=2= Why are you posting about it here?
=3= How do you know that it is in fact the film _The Net 2.0_ if nobody's seen it legitimately?
=4= Why the <****> are you posting about it here?
=5= Did it ever occur to you that maybe the MPAA is just getting an early start at napster bombing crappy films in place of a pending release?
=6= Why the <****> did you think, of all things, that posting about it here was a good idea?
=7= Did it ever occur to you that maybe the MPAA owns your dumb arse?
Re: ==== FUNNIEST THREAD EVAR ====
by - the_american_bad_ass (Sat Jan 7 2006 18:32:10 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Sat Jan 7 2006 18:32:40
unreleased?
The movie is out since a couple of months and I own the original. Say what you want but it is released!!
cdw322 is just a liar!!
Re: ==== FUNNIEST THREAD EVAR ====
by - MobiusM1 (Sat Jan 7 2006 18:39:37 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
cdw322 may be a liar, but this film has _not_ yet seen its release date.
I've had the unfortunate experience of renting the original myself.
Re: ==== FUNNIEST THREAD EVAR ====
by - dunctait 4 days ago (Tue Jan 10 2006 10:45:50 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
i dunno, i know on imdb you get a lot of trolls claiming to be famous but this guy has ome credibility. first the guy hes *pretending* to be isnt that famous. he registered with the username that happens to be the directors initials months ago, and this is his first post.
anyway im a fan of hacker movies etc (not that i particularly like them, i just try to watch a lot of them) and i noticed the Net 2.0 was on torrents mid-december.
Re: Seen it, this movie is pretty lame
by - gilnor83 5 days ago (Mon Jan 9 2006 12:11:09 )
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Mon Jan 9 2006 12:12:01
This movie has not been released on DVD but it's available all over the net, I have the movie too, in which decade you live? 1920?? Mobius m1, you really seems to be one heck on an annoying person!
"
