- Feb 26, 2006
- 65,429
- 13,756
- 146
That's good, my Grandmother just got diagnosed with Breast Cancer.
More power to the kid
Supporting such things is entirely appropriate, no doubt about it. However, can't a line be drawn in how that support is shown? Isn't there such a thing as inappropriate support?
Wearing petrochemical bracelets is easier than reducing environmental toxins that accumulate in fatty breast tissue I suppose.
<== Downer man
We really need to bring back the cookie. Anyway, I award one cookie.They should make them out of hemp, and kill 2 birds(boobies?) with 1 stone :^D
We really need to bring back the cookie. Anyway, I award one cookie.
But, but... I like cookies :^(How can you give him a cookie when there are Starving people in the Third world? :|
I take a cookie from sandorski and give it to starving people in the third world.How can you give him a cookie when there are Starving people in the Third world? :|
I take a cookie from sandorski and give it to starving people in the third world.
No... There's no such thing as a "bad" word.
I disagree completely! I'm not saying this specifically is a bad word, but there are bad words. Derogatory words are entirely the point here. There's a specific reason why the word "boobies" is used, and it isn't because it is proper. Psychologically people intentionally do bad things for humor. It's funny because it's wrong. So here I am with this argument. It wouldn't be funny if it weren't a bad word.
A bad word's only bad, if people make it so. It's just letters, and sounds strung together. If I wore a "great person" shirt, would that be bad? What if everybody wore a "great person" shirt? Would it still be bad, or is it just a word?
The number of people that do it does not make it okay. Your argument fits in some cases but not all.
The number of people that do it does not make it okay. Your argument fits in some cases but not all.
The number of people very much affects the outcome. If everybody wore the "great person" shirt, it would lose it's teeth. It would be just another word. That can apply to individuals also. Words only have power if you give them power. They're completely meaningless until the listener gives them meaning.
But your argument ignores that the word already has power. The word wouldn't exist without that power. Your hypothetical situation can't happen, it's pure philosophy.