Notice anything strange about claim 9?

sandmanwake · Nov 2, 2006

drinkmorejava · Nov 2, 2006

The Stigenator · Nov 2, 2006

lol.. rofl!

chambersc · Nov 2, 2006

i read it...i don't understand.

Rike · Nov 2, 2006

I guess the inventor never read the app. If he had, claim #9 would have been removed. Not very professional, but it is stink'n funny.

Midlander · Nov 2, 2006

I've heard of students doing that type of thing in term papers, but I didn't know lawyers did it, too.

everman · Nov 2, 2006

Claim 11 as well

Sqube · Nov 2, 2006

No... 11 is fine.

It says that the advanced interface allows the user to select a custom image, but the standard interface does not.