Nothing is going to help Cuomo, he is screwed.

[raildogg]

You keep saying liberals don't fight for average people.

You are such an idiot it pains me that you too get to use up natural resources.

Which party just tried to give tuition free community college? Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices? Expand Medicaid? Increase the minimum wage? Expand Medicare? Extend universal pre k? Affordable housing? Make corporations pussy their fair share? Etc... All shit to benefit regular folks. Only reason half didn't pass us because a tiny fraction of Democrats are corrupt and because tiny backwards unevolved red States have too much power.

You spoutv come bullshit and think you are in the middle. You are as useless to the conversation as the most ignorant Trumpie.

Dammm bud, you sound pretty fired up there. Where were you when America was bombing the shit out of Syria, Lybia, Iraq and Afghanistan?

Ah ok, back to your talking points. Your welfare state programs and freebies won't mean nothing when cost of living is out of control. Maybe instead of government expanding its powers and gaining voters for life by giving them free stuff, it needs to fight the oligopolies which have made life hard for the average person. A couple of companies will own majority of the houses going forward. Will some government freebie offset that?

Here, even fake news CNN finally has a useful story:

Wall Street is buying up family homes. The rent checks are too juicy to ignore | CNN Business

Housing markets are hotter than ever, and big money is getting in on the act.

www.cnn.com

Who will fight Blackrock? Probably no one. These guys will be the future land lords. This is not just Blackrock but many other billion dollar Wall Street investors and hedge funds. The rate of them buying houses is rapidly increasing. Squeezing out anybody else.

Guess who this will hurt? Younger people, minorities and many middle class home buyers. But no, we are too busy arguing over government freebies while Wall Street mega corps are buying the whole country.

 

[Paratus]

Cuomosexuals?? There are some unusual things I've seen vis-a-vis sexuality and gender lately, but this one is new to me.
Perhaps you can draw us a diagram? Flowchart, perhaps? Maybe you can use a chalk board. Those worked out so well for Glenn Beck.

The term came up spring of 2020. Cuomo while an ass, was having daily informative COVID briefings compared to the shitfest that was Trumps administration. The press was giving Cuomo a lot of praise for being competent and they were called Cuomosexuals.

 

[MrSquished]

Dammm bud, you sound pretty fired up there. Where were you when America was bombing the shit out Syria, Lybia, Iraq and Afghanistan?

Ah ok, back to your talking points. Your welfare state programs and freebies won't mean shit when cost of living is out of control. Maybe instead of government expanding its powers and gaining voters for life by giving them free stuff, it needs to fight the oligopolies which have made life hard for the average person. A couple of companies will own majority of the houses going forward. Will some government freebie offset that?

Here, even fake news CNN finally has a useful story:

Wall Street is buying up family homes. The rent checks are too juicy to ignore | CNN Business

Housing markets are hotter than ever, and big money is getting in on the act.

www.cnn.com

Who will fight Blackrock? Probably no one.

Guess who this will hurt? Younger people, minorities and many middle class home buyers. But no, we are too busy arguing over government freebies while Wall Street mega corps are buying the whole country.

You just move the goal posts because you are just unhinged from reality and literally unhinged.

Say liberals don't want to do things to help regular people. Get pointed out you are full of shit. Now you call anything helping regular people the welfare state. And then bring up complete strawman nonsense to boot.

Like I said, you are as useless to the advancement of society as the worst Trumpie. Two types of people that don't exist in reality or are so dishonest it's the same.Two sides of the same coin.

 

[cytg111]

Your welfare state programs and freebies won't mean nothing when cost of living is out of control. Maybe instead of government expanding its powers and gaining voters for life by giving them free stuff, it needs to fight the oligopolies which have made life hard for the average person. A couple of companies will own majority of the houses going forward. Will some government freebie offset that?

You like the American Dream right?

Here it is

All the "free stuff" you are talking about it literally fertilizer for your society.

 

[fskimospy]

Which other politician is in the news? If there is, I shall extend that to him or her. I mean, Bill Gates (not a politician) is a someone with connections to Epstein. Does that count? But so does Trump, Clinton, etc etc. There are no good guys.

Nope, just wondering if there were any politican you found to be a particularly egregious sex criminal.

 

[raildogg]

Nope, just wondering if there were any politican you found to be a particularly egregious sex criminal.

We cannot prioritize one flaw of man over another. Many politicians have blood on their hands but don't commit sexual crimes. So who is worse here? They are both of lower conscious levels. It's just that the public tends to forgive one set of "sins" over another set of "sins." For example, the public seems to have forgiven war criminals Bush and Cheney.

As to your question, I want to know what you are trying to get at. I don't follow politics too closely so let me know which politicians are you implying are doing this stuff.

 

[fskimospy]

We cannot prioritize one flaw of man over another. Many politicians have blood on their hands but don't commit sexual crimes. So who is worse here? They are both of lower conscious levels. It's just that the public tends to forgive one set of "sins" over another set of "sins." For example, the public seems to have forgiven war criminals Bush and Cheney.

As to your question, I want to know what you are trying to get at. I don't follow politics too closely so let me know which politicians are you implying are doing this stuff.

You seem to be someone who doesn’t like sex crimes committed by politicians. I happen to agree with you.

So, as people who are in favor of the robust prosecution of politicians committing sex crimes I was wondering if there were any other politicians you could think of that would merit similar attention.

 

[raildogg]

If

You seem to be someone who doesn’t like sex crimes committed by politicians. I happen to agree with you.

So, as people who are in favor of the robust prosecution of politicians committing sex crimes I was wondering if there were any other politicians you could think of that would merit similar attention.

If there are, then they should. No doubt. I don't care for either party or any politician. We have seen high profile cases such as Anthony Weiner, Eric Schneiderman, Elliot Spitzer and probably others. But that doesn't mean there isn't a lot of hush money being thrown around. These men in high places do plenty of dirty stuff that gets swept away by money and power.

 

[fskimospy]

If

If there are, then they should. No doubt. I don't care for either party or any politician. We have seen high profile cases such as Anthony Weiner, Eric Schneiderman, Elliot Spitzer and probably others. But that doesn't mean there isn't a lot of hush money being thrown around. These men in high places do plenty of dirty stuff that gets swept away by money and power.

Okay - can you think of any prominent Republican politicians who should be prosecuted for sex crimes based on the exact same standards you’re using here?

Remember - you’re not political.

 

[raildogg]

Okay - can you think of any prominent Republican politicians who should be prosecuted for sex crimes based on the exact same standards you’re using here?

Hmm, I have asked you multiple times to tell me. I guess this is a test?

 

[fskimospy]

Hmm, I have asked you multiple times to tell me. I guess this is a test?

Why would I tell you? This is your standard.

 

[raildogg]

Why would I tell you? This is your standard.

Wow, I guess I should do some research into Republican sexual deviants? Will that level the field?

 

[fskimospy]

Wow, I guess I should do some research into Republican sexual deviants? Will that level the field?

I just figured if you were angry about your list of politician sex offenders you would probably be EXTREMELY angry about vastly more prominent, prolific, and severe politician sex offenders that mysteriously went unmentioned.

As a non political person it’s odd these unmentioned individuals didn’t top your list because naturally you apply objective criteria when coming up with it.

 

[hal2kilo]

I’m not speaking of any politician in particular, you just seem to be angry about politicians accused of sex crimes so I was wondering who else that extended to.

Not the "grab'em by the pussie guy".