Note to movie studios: Do NOT switch aspect ratios in the middle of the film.

chuckywang

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
20,133
1
0
I recently went to see Enchanted, and the sides of the film were blocked by curtains. This was annoying enough to me that I went and complained to the theatre staff, where I was informed that they can't draw back the curtains. That was total BS, but I didn't want to miss any more of the movie, so I let it go.

Anyways, I was just reading the trivia for this movie here. If you're familiar with this movie, part of it is animated and part of it is live action. The animated parts were filmed with a 1.75:1 aspect ratio. The live action parts were filmed wtih a 2.35:1 aspect ratio. My suspicion was that the curtains were there to frame the movie as a 1.75:1 movie, but did not take into account the switch to 2.35:1. Therefore, during the live-action parts, parts of the sides were blocked by the curtains.

Now, I wish I could remember if the sides were blocked or not during the animated parts.....
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
You paid money to see Enchanted?

heh i took my daughter to see it. she loved it! me? i just wanted the "princess" to come home with me..
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
50,619
42,146
136
Originally posted by: chuckywang
I recently went to see Enchanted, and the sides of the film were blocked by curtains. This was annoying enough to me that I went and complained to the theatre staff, where I was informed that they can't draw back the curtains. That was total BS, but I didn't want to miss any more of the movie, so I let it go.

Anyways, I was just reading the trivia for this movie here. If you're familiar with this movie, part of it is animated and part of it is live action. The animated parts were filmed with a 1.75:1 aspect ratio. The live action parts were filmed wtih a 2.35:1 aspect ratio. My suspicion was that the curtains were there to frame the movie as a 1.75:1 movie, but did not take into account the switch to 2.35:1. Therefore, during the live-action parts, parts of the sides were blocked by the curtains.

Now, I wish I could remember if the sides were blocked or not during the animated parts.....

The theater screwed up and didn't include the cues for masking/lens changes when they built the print. They were probably too lazy to tear it down and correct the problem.

Where did this happen?
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
You paid money to see Enchanted?

Yes, and it was a better movie than you think.

the song in the park was great. i was laughing at how they make fun of the other disney movies LOL

 

Gibson486

Lifer
Aug 9, 2000
18,378
1
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
You paid money to see Enchanted?

heh i took my daughter to see it. she loved it! me? i just wanted the "princess" to come home with me..

what...your daughter does not live with you?;)
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: chuckywang
I recently went to see Enchanted, and the sides of the film were blocked by curtains. This was annoying enough to me that I went and complained to the theatre staff, where I was informed that they can't draw back the curtains. That was total BS, but I didn't want to miss any more of the movie, so I let it go.

Anyways, I was just reading the trivia for this movie here. If you're familiar with this movie, part of it is animated and part of it is live action. The animated parts were filmed with a 1.75:1 aspect ratio. The live action parts were filmed wtih a 2.35:1 aspect ratio. My suspicion was that the curtains were there to frame the movie as a 1.75:1 movie, but did not take into account the switch to 2.35:1. Therefore, during the live-action parts, parts of the sides were blocked by the curtains.

Now, I wish I could remember if the sides were blocked or not during the animated parts.....

your suspicious should be right in regards to the curtains framing to the one aspect ratio, as that is what they are there to do. However, the theater should have retained all abilities to control the curtains. Yes, they are connected to an automated system based on the ratio of the film (and the lens used is even changed for different aspect ratios, well at least I was told thats how the machines at my old job functioned), but they should retain control, as our theater every now and then had complaints about the curtains, and the booth managers were able to correct the problem.. so..?

but wow.. a movie switching theatrical ratios? weird..
 

chuckywang

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
20,133
1
0
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: chuckywang
I recently went to see Enchanted, and the sides of the film were blocked by curtains. This was annoying enough to me that I went and complained to the theatre staff, where I was informed that they can't draw back the curtains. That was total BS, but I didn't want to miss any more of the movie, so I let it go.

Anyways, I was just reading the trivia for this movie here. If you're familiar with this movie, part of it is animated and part of it is live action. The animated parts were filmed with a 1.75:1 aspect ratio. The live action parts were filmed wtih a 2.35:1 aspect ratio. My suspicion was that the curtains were there to frame the movie as a 1.75:1 movie, but did not take into account the switch to 2.35:1. Therefore, during the live-action parts, parts of the sides were blocked by the curtains.

Now, I wish I could remember if the sides were blocked or not during the animated parts.....

The theater screwed up and didn't include the cues for masking/lens changes when they built the print. They were probably too lazy to tear it down and correct the problem.

Where did this happen?

Kerasotes Theatres Golf Mill.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Gibson486
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
You paid money to see Enchanted?

heh i took my daughter to see it. she loved it! me? i just wanted the "princess" to come home with me..

what...your daughter does not live with you?;)

lol ohh that was good.


have you seen previews? the "princess" is hot. i love the dress she makes out of his curtains. she has that innocent next door neighbor look to her that is sooo hot.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
50,619
42,146
136
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: chuckywang
I recently went to see Enchanted, and the sides of the film were blocked by curtains. This was annoying enough to me that I went and complained to the theatre staff, where I was informed that they can't draw back the curtains. That was total BS, but I didn't want to miss any more of the movie, so I let it go.

Anyways, I was just reading the trivia for this movie here. If you're familiar with this movie, part of it is animated and part of it is live action. The animated parts were filmed with a 1.75:1 aspect ratio. The live action parts were filmed wtih a 2.35:1 aspect ratio. My suspicion was that the curtains were there to frame the movie as a 1.75:1 movie, but did not take into account the switch to 2.35:1. Therefore, during the live-action parts, parts of the sides were blocked by the curtains.

Now, I wish I could remember if the sides were blocked or not during the animated parts.....

The theater screwed up and didn't include the cues for masking/lens changes when they built the print. They were probably too lazy to tear it down and correct the problem.

Where did this happen?

Kerasotes Theatres Golf Mill.

YHPM
 

BooGiMaN

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2001
7,955
0
0
i dont think they thought the movie out well when it comes to children

****SPOILERS****


my daughter and a few kids in the audience kept asking why the princess did not end up with and marry the prince




 

MmmSkyscraper

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
9,472
1
76
Originally posted by: BooGiMaN
i dont think they thought the movie out well when it comes to children

my daughter and a few kids in the audience kept asking why the princess did not end up with and marry the prince

ZOMGSPOILERZ! :|
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Gibson486
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
You paid money to see Enchanted?

heh i took my daughter to see it. she loved it! me? i just wanted the "princess" to come home with me..

what...your daughter does not live with you?;)

lol ohh that was good.


have you seen previews? the "princess" is hot. i love the dress she makes out of his curtains. she has that innocent next door neighbor look to her that is sooo hot.

pics?
 

OdiN

Banned
Mar 1, 2000
16,430
3
0
How about this? Everything should be in 16:9 so that there are no damned black bars when watching the movies on TV's - which are pretty much all 16:9 widescreens.
 

abaez

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2000
7,155
1
81
I've worked as a projectionist for six years and I highly doubt the film changed aspect ratio right in the middle of the movie without some sort of intermission. It may have been filmed a certain way, but it would have stayed the same throughout the film.

Besides, if one part was in scope and the lens on the projector was set to flat, the image would have been WAY stretched up and down beyond the borders of the screen. The other way around I think the image would have been showing on the curtains on the sides (been a long time).

Actually I just looked up the film information at www.film-tech.com:

Walt Disney
Scope
6 Reels
SRD/DTS/SDDS/Cyan
Attached Trailer: National Treasure 2
TES Depot

And this came in the cans: http://www.film-tech.com/uploa...oads0503/Enchanted.jpg.

So the theatre should have shown it as scope, even though the first 11 minutes appear to be in 1.85 (flat). It sounds like they had the wrong masking for the curtains but the correct lens.
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
Originally posted by: OdiN
How about this? Everything should be in 16:9 so that there are no damned black bars when watching the movies on TV's - which are pretty much all 16:9 widescreens.

How about no, Scott.
 

AbAbber2k

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
6,474
1
0
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
You paid money to see Enchanted?

Yes, and it was a better movie than you think.

Agreed. I went with my [now ex] and enjoyed it more than I expected. It was funny because it was basically a parody of every Disney movie ever made, mixed in with it's own plot.

And the GF was hotter than the princess.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
50,619
42,146
136
Originally posted by: abaez
I've worked as a projectionist for six years and I highly doubt the film changed aspect ratio right in the middle of the movie without some sort of intermission. It may have been filmed a certain way, but it would have stayed the same throughout the film.

Besides, if one part was in scope and the lens on the projector was set to flat, the image would have been WAY stretched up and down beyond the borders of the screen. The other way around I think the image would have been showing on the curtains on the sides (been a long time).

Actually I just looked up the film information at www.film-tech.com:

Walt Disney
Scope
6 Reels
SRD/DTS/SDDS/Cyan
Attached Trailer: National Treasure 2
TES Depot

And this came in the cans: http://www.film-tech.com/uploa...oads0503/Enchanted.jpg.

So the theatre should have shown it as scope, even though the first 11 minutes appear to be in 1.85 (flat). It sounds like they had the wrong masking for the curtains but the correct lens.

The theater was even dumber than I thought since Technicolor provided (what should have been) foolproof instructions in the cans.