Not a repost. Michael Moore's fraudulant self pointed out

[dolph]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: dolph
assume all the details mentioned about bowling were false. one key question remains: per capita, do we have a significantly higher gun homicide rate than other countries? and if so, why?

We have a higher rate of murder across the board, not just with guns when you compare our crime rates with countries that have lower homicide rates.. So that kinda blows the "guns cause murder" simplistic nonsense out of the water.

What must be addressed is why we kill, not how. Until you address the will, nothing you do about the means will matter.

It's the same with drug abuse.

ok, then why do we have a higher murder rate?

 

OMG WHY ANOTHER EFFING MICHAEL MOORE THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/quote]

ok, then why do we have a higher murder rate?

Because there are more restrictive laws here. Prime example: Switzerland.

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
yes, this is a repost. damn you and your non-repost propaganda.

 

[RyanM]

Originally posted by: Karsten
You guys miss the main point here. Michael Moore is a fraud and a liar!

If reality doesn't fit his bill he edited it to the point where it serves him or his reality! Never mind that he portrays people in a way (editing different sentences totally out of context) that makes them look like real bad people. That is very close to what the Nazi's did to make their "points" believable.

Simply... at the very least he should not have gotten and Oscar and should be known and treated like the liar and opportunist that he is!

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: Munchies
I would be for better regulation of guns. NOT banishment of them. A world without hunting and plinking... NOOOO

Oh, you mean like Canada? Yeah, only police officers have guns here. Even our criminals decide to follow the gun laws. They hold up banks with crossbows now and carjack with chainsaws and hockey sticks.

</sarcasm>

- M4H

 

[Kaervak]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: Munchies
I would be for better regulation of guns. NOT banishment of them. A world without hunting and plinking... NOOOO

Oh, you mean like Canada? Yeah, only police officers have guns here. Even our criminals decide to follow the gun laws. They hold up banks with crossbows now and carjack with chainsaws and hockey sticks.

</sarcasm>

- M4H

You know, that sounds like a interesting video game.

 

[conjur]

"never seen before"????

this is a repost of a repost of a repost of a....

Search for Moore and you'll see.

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: Kaervak

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: Munchies
I would be for better regulation of guns. NOT banishment of them. A world without hunting and plinking... NOOOO

Oh, you mean like Canada? Yeah, only police officers have guns here. Even our criminals decide to follow the gun laws. They hold up banks with crossbows now and carjack with chainsaws and hockey sticks.

</sarcasm>

- M4H

You know, that sounds like a interesting video game.

GTA:GTA - Grand Theft Auto - Greater Toronto Area



- M4H

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: dolph

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: dolph
assume all the details mentioned about bowling were false. one key question remains: per capita, do we have a significantly higher gun homicide rate than other countries? and if so, why?

We have a higher rate of murder across the board, not just with guns when you compare our crime rates with countries that have lower homicide rates.. So that kinda blows the "guns cause murder" simplistic nonsense out of the water.

What must be addressed is why we kill, not how. Until you address the will, nothing you do about the means will matter.

It's the same with drug abuse.

ok, then why do we have a higher murder rate?

That's the $64,000 question. Every special interest group thinks their pet peeve is the cause. All are clamoring for more regulation here, and more restrictions there... and the sad thing is, most of these are passed. But the truth is, we had a much lower murder rate when we had far fewer laws. So why, as we add more laws, does our crime rate continue to go up?

I posit that it is not a law enforcement or legislative issue to begin with. It's a social and moral issue. Again, I think it's the same with drug abuse.

 

[feralkid]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: dolph

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: dolph
assume all the details mentioned about bowling were false. one key question remains: per capita, do we have a significantly higher gun homicide rate than other countries? and if so, why?

We have a higher rate of murder across the board, not just with guns when you compare our crime rates with countries that have lower homicide rates.. So that kinda blows the "guns cause murder" simplistic nonsense out of the water.

What must be addressed is why we kill, not how. Until you address the will, nothing you do about the means will matter.

It's the same with drug abuse.

ok, then why do we have a higher murder rate?

That's the $64,000 question. Every special interest group thinks their pet peeve is the cause. All are clamoring for more regulation here, and more restrictions there... and the sad thing is, most of these are passed. But the truth is, we had a much lower murder rate when we had far fewer laws. So why, as we add more laws, does our crime rate continue to go up?

I posit that it is not a law enforcement or legislative issue to begin with. It's a social and moral issue. Again, I think it's the same with drug abuse.

so, are you for the legalization of drugs?

 

[Antisocial Virge]

lying sack of sh|t that needs to have a 357 slug lodged right between the eyes

Yea, you really help the pro gun people you do..

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: feralkid

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: dolph

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: dolph
assume all the details mentioned about bowling were false. one key question remains: per capita, do we have a significantly higher gun homicide rate than other countries? and if so, why?

We have a higher rate of murder across the board, not just with guns when you compare our crime rates with countries that have lower homicide rates.. So that kinda blows the "guns cause murder" simplistic nonsense out of the water.

What must be addressed is why we kill, not how. Until you address the will, nothing you do about the means will matter.

It's the same with drug abuse.

ok, then why do we have a higher murder rate?

That's the $64,000 question. Every special interest group thinks their pet peeve is the cause. All are clamoring for more regulation here, and more restrictions there... and the sad thing is, most of these are passed. But the truth is, we had a much lower murder rate when we had far fewer laws. So why, as we add more laws, does our crime rate continue to go up?

I posit that it is not a law enforcement or legislative issue to begin with. It's a social and moral issue. Again, I think it's the same with drug abuse.

so, are you for the legalization of drugs?

Pretty much, yeah. I think the illegality of them has caused more harm than they ever could have. Not to mention I think it's unconstitutional. Unfortunately, if you say this, people automatically think you approve of drug use. I do not.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: SilverThief
Michael Moore is a fat-assed, lying sack of sh|t that needs to have a 357 slug lodged right between the eyes.
He's only in it for the notoriety and attention.

You might as well have posted "I'm a knuckle dragging Moron" as it would have had the same effect as your original post!

 

[hdeck]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: SilverThief
Michael Moore is a fat-assed, lying sack of sh|t that needs to have a 357 slug lodged right between the eyes.
He's only in it for the notoriety and attention.

You might as well have posted "I'm a knuckle dragging Moron" as it would have had the same effect as your original post!

where's the fun in that?

 

[BadNewsBears]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: Munchies
I would be for better regulation of guns. NOT banishment of them. A world without hunting and plinking... NOOOO

Oh, you mean like Canada? Yeah, only police officers have guns here. Even our criminals decide to follow the gun laws. They hold up banks with crossbows now and carjack with chainsaws and hockey sticks.

</sarcasm>

- M4H

Better REG as in gun id. Murder's can be solved in an insatnt. A national rifling database. All guns bought from said date and up must be registered. I have no problem with that as long as I dont have to gt rid of my guns

 

[BadNewsBears]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: Munchies
I would be for better regulation of guns. NOT banishment of them. A world without hunting and plinking... NOOOO

Oh, you mean like Canada? Yeah, only police officers have guns here. Even our criminals decide to follow the gun laws. They hold up banks with crossbows now and carjack with chainsaws and hockey sticks.

</sarcasm>

- M4H

The regulations would have worked better if it wernt for the canuck's who went bad!

 

[Jmmsbnd007]

Originally posted by: Munchies

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: Munchies
I would be for better regulation of guns. NOT banishment of them. A world without hunting and plinking... NOOOO

Oh, you mean like Canada? Yeah, only police officers have guns here. Even our criminals decide to follow the gun laws. They hold up banks with crossbows now and carjack with chainsaws and hockey sticks.

</sarcasm>

- M4H

Better REG as in gun id. Murder's can be solved in an insatnt. A national rifling database. All guns bought from said date and up must be registered. I have no problem with that as long as I dont have to gt rid of my guns

Wrong again. Ballistic fingerprinting horribly fails.

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: Munchies
I would be for better regulation of guns. NOT banishment of them. A world without hunting and plinking... NOOOO

Oh, you mean like Canada? Yeah, only police officers have guns here. Even our criminals decide to follow the gun laws. They hold up banks with crossbows now and carjack with chainsaws and hockey sticks.

</sarcasm>

- M4H

Yup, just bought me a Husqavarna with a 1m(39") bar for deer season and home defence. The next time one of those face masked skateless hockey stick hoodlums break-in they're in for a big surprise!

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007

Originally posted by: Munchies

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: Munchies
I would be for better regulation of guns. NOT banishment of them. A world without hunting and plinking... NOOOO

Oh, you mean like Canada? Yeah, only police officers have guns here. Even our criminals decide to follow the gun laws. They hold up banks with crossbows now and carjack with chainsaws and hockey sticks.

</sarcasm>

- M4H

Better REG as in gun id. Murder's can be solved in an insatnt. A national rifling database. All guns bought from said date and up must be registered. I have no problem with that as long as I dont have to gt rid of my guns

Wrong again. Ballistic fingerprinting horribly fails.

Yep, in every place it's been tried, it has failed to solve a single crime.

Let's face it, putting regulations on legal gun owners has little to no effect on criminals.

 

[FeathersMcGraw]

Never seen before, if you didn't read this thread.