NOT a hot babe thread: Scientific Remote Viewing (free audio course) - Is it real?

OptiQ

Banned
Oct 12, 2001
154
0
0
It is called SRV, or Scientific Remote Viewing. Here's a quote from one web site I recently found:


Underpinning all of the research is the hypothesis that all humans are composite beings. This means that we have two fundamental aspects: a soul and a body. In the current jargon of remote viewing, the soul is called the "subspace aspect" of a person. The physical realm of solid matter is both separate from and connected to subspace. Once our physical bodies expire, we are no longer composite beings, and we continue our existence as subspace entities.

While we are composite beings, physical stimuli tend to dominate our awareness. This means that our five senses (taste, touch, sight, hearing, smell) overshadow the more intuitive awareness originating from the subspace side. In practical terms, this means that most people are not aware that they even have a subspace aspect. In short, soul voices are deafened by the din of our five physical senses.

In order to break through this noise, specialized techniques are required. In general, these techniques focus on shifting a person's awareness away from the five physical senses. It is not necessary to force a shift in one's awareness toward the subspace aspect. This happens automatically once a person's awareness is no longer riveted on the physical side of life...



They even have a complete and free audio course consisting of 24 (!!!) 30 to 60 minutes lessons here http://www.farsight.org/SRV/SRVaudioindex.html. I went through the first couple of lessons and it all seems very logical and well thought out.

Anyway, I just wanted to find out what you all think about this topic.
 

OptiQ

Banned
Oct 12, 2001
154
0
0


<< maybe this should be in hot deals? >>

Well, certainly not a discussion...

So, anyone tried one of those audio lessons?
 

ericb

Senior member
Nov 11, 1999
898
0
0
I've read a couple of books on the subject based on the studies the CIA conducted. The ex-participants stated that it worked extremely well but it was very subjective to the viewer. The official answer was that we studied it and it didn't work so we moved on to something else.
 

ericb

Senior member
Nov 11, 1999
898
0
0
Thanks for the link BTW. I'm getting a real fast download speed from them.