This doesn't really have anything to do with this thread... Why don't you just name the right wingers you're thinking of so they can respond to you if they want to?
What else could they say? This is not news.
Has everything to do with this thread. There is no need to call out names, these people know who they are, they just need to man up and admit they are wrong.
Ummm what does profiling have to do with this? Are you accusing me of being one of those people?
I didn't, but if the glove fits...
If so, touche. ADD kicking in and I cannot read the rest of the thread :'(Already been addressed several times.
If so, touche. ADD kicking in and I cannot read the rest of the thread :'(
I am not doing damage control for a terrorist. Are you saying this party that he was once a member of are all terrorists?
I think you'd understand my motivation if you had read my responses to woolfe in this thread. For example he basically asked the same question you did at the end of your post and I already addressed it. Look I get it, you don't want to read the whole thread you just want to get your opinions out there more than anything else.
Lol, he seriously has a racist alt account?
He has an alt account Baasha. InfoHawk is his white supremacist account and Baasha is his Indian Hindu nationalist account. You caught him posting under InfoHawk, but using his Baasha speech.
Interesting, i did not know that, and he hasn't denied your accusations so i'll assume this is legit.
I just want to clarify that I am not saying that you are supporting the guy who did this, just that you are not being as harsh on him and the types of people who support him for the sake of making a point about how the west is morally superior to the middle east.
Why did this need a new thread?
My assumption was that it was to run away from the apt critique that the condemnation of Islam (as recorded by many members of this forum) was in concert with the views of the killer.Why did this need a new thread?
He has broad right wing support on his politics, just not his tactics
Right, there is no support for his actions which was my point.
By the way, do you think Islam contributes to Islamic extremism the way you seem to think that right-wing ideology contributed to this guy's actions? Seems like you would have to if you want to be consistent.
I absolutely think that Islam, especially Wahhabi, contributes to Islamic extremism the same way right-wing ideology contributed to this guy's action. So yes, I am consistent in this regard. Now how about you, do you think Islam doesn't contribute to Islamic extremism like you think right-wing ideology didn't contribute to this guy's actions? Seems like you have to if YOU want to be consistent.
I've said before I'm fine with chalking this up into the right-wing terrorism column...
Meaning right-wing ideology contributed to this guy's actions, or you are dodging that obvious conclusion?
The guy's ideology was a cause of his actions just like the religion of the 9/11 attackers was a cause of their actions.
