All these people spewing obscenities and making useless blanket statements about how bad this product is: Do you have anything constuctive to contribute? Like mention an alternative product that you believe is better?
For a vast majority of users, a solid AV product that
1) has been highly rated by MULTIPLE reviewers,
2) costs next to nothing,
3) installs in under a minute,
4) requires almost no hands-on maintenance
is a good deal.
Here's something constructive:
Norton has consistently sucked (in detection, resource use, nagging users after 12 month period is up then borking your system if you go to another product) for a 10 year period.
Anyone that does ANYTHING in IT has dealt with these issues for such a long period of time that most of us won't touch anything symantec OR mcafee.
So yes, maybe - just maybe now that it's 2010 they have come out with a product that fixes all of this crap but personally I don't buy it.
Either way, MS security essentials does a better job, also detects spyware, and is FREE. So there's my 'constructive post' combined with a 'better solution'
So while this deal may be hot (thanks OP for trying to help out) it's still a CRAPPY company pushing a *likely* CRAPPY product.
Seriously... Have any of you norton pushers ever had to remove an expired version of their product?? It's a total nightmare! It says a lot that both norton and mcafee have had to release 'uninstallers' that help pick *some* of the BS entries they add back out. Sounds like a virus to me.
Microsoft Security Essentials:
1) has been highly rated by MULTIPLE reviewers,
2) costs nothing,
3) installs in a few minutes (does this even really matter?)
4) requires no hands-on maintenance