Norton AntiVirus or AVG Free AntiVirus?

BroadbandGamer

Senior member
Sep 13, 2003
976
0
0
I want a program that doesn't use much resources, can scan for viruses and then leave me alone.

What do you guys think?
 

dguy6789

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2002
8,558
3
76
Norton would probably be better than AVG, but I prefer Kaspersky to all of them. The only bad side to Kaspersky is that is takes longer than most others to load up into the tray, but other than that it performs very well.
 

mdchesne

Banned
Feb 27, 2005
2,810
1
0
neither. I foudn trend micro pc to find more viruses and spamware than norton, mcaffee, and certainly all the free programs out there
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
If you had to pick between the two I suggest Norton.

Just dont let it autorun or autoupdate or any other auto crap.


P.S. I have used both and Norton finds all kinds of stuff AVG wont.
BUT..... For a free utility AVG is actually pretty nice.
 

daniel49

Diamond Member
Jan 8, 2005
4,814
0
71
have used both. You will get better detection with norton but I do think Its bloated and slows your system.

Am trying trend on one system now..good detection but updates are very bloated for some reason I can update twice a week and its a 7 mb file each time?

Mcafee I would avoid like the plague...they say kapersky is good but I still don't trust russians;)


my two cents worth
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
Go here and click "online results".

The most recent results are for May. It's pretty early in the morning, but it appears the winner is NOD32.

NAV's results are so bad as to be embarrasing. Kaspersky consistently scores high. Results will vary from month month.

When our NAV subscriptions expire, I'm moving to another product.
 

yukichigai

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2003
6,404
0
76
Since we have your ear Schadenfroh, do you happen to have an updated list of x64-compatible Free AV programs? I'm still using Avast; it'd be nice to be able to switch to something a little better.