http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/custom...00549320&#loan
Seems to be the exact same formula the nook uses. Not all books can be loaned and they can only be loaned once. So far every book I've bought can be loaned.
My library supports several formats including the kindle one so no problem there for me.
Apple moves that many iPads in 5 weeks. Amazon just might ship 3M Kindle Fires in the last 6 weeks of this year.Why does the Anandtech article say the original Nook was a modest success, didn't they ship over 3 million units? That seems pretty significant to me.
Guess they just started doing the lending thing as well. Last I checked they didn't have that feature. Oh well. But my library doesn't support Kindle. Also I have a ton of PRC, and LIT books I've bought over the years from fictionwise.com which was bought out by B&N. I an read them easily on my nook, but have to pay to have Amazon convert them to kindle format. One of the reasons I didn't get the kindle.
Well I found my wife's Xmass gift. She wants something to read books and magazines on. I will gladly pay 50 dollars for a SD card slot and 8 GB more on board storage. I am a prime customer and the streaming videos would of been nice. But I can not have a media device that has 8 gigs of storage that is a deal breaker.
Unless, you know, you use Android -- and oops, right, all these competitors do. Google Music = ginormous free cloud storage.free cloud storage, which you don't get with the others
BigDaddyD said:Why do you need all of your media on board with you at all times?
It doesn't have 8gb of storage, it has 8gb of on board storage and free cloud storage, which you don't get with the others. That is a big difference. Why do you need all of your media on board with you at all times? You leave most of it on the cloud and transfer it back and forth as needed. I do it all the time. I don't keep everything on my phone. In fact, I forget how much storage I currently have available on my Thunderbolt, but I am nowhere near capacity. I keep what I like on it and have most of my stuff (but not all, haven't gotten around to uploading everything) on the cloud. The best part is that all of your Amazon purchases don't take up any cloud space.
Apple moves that many iPads in 5 weeks. Amazon just might ship 3M Kindle Fires in the last 6 weeks of this year.
So in the grand scheme of things, NOOK Color is a moderate success.
Unless, you know, you use Android -- and oops, right, all these competitors do. Google Music = ginormous free cloud storage.
What good is the cloud storage when you go places where you don't have wifi?
This is exactly what I was saying in a recent thread on this topic. Or rather, was trying to say, as no one got it.You're probably right, but when you step outside of your own tech-knowledge and view things it can be surprising how people base their decisions.
I was talking the other day to a lady who was on the verge of ordering "...that color Kindle". That's all she knows these things as. I said she might want to wait and see what The Nook has to offer. "The what?" I didn't know the stats at the time, but I'm willing to bet I could have mentioned 1GB vs 512 and SD card slots etc. and just be greeted with a blank stare to much of it. Her whole perspective was "I buy from Amazon all the time, I trust them. I don't care as much for B&N." Done deal.
I'd be willing to bet that non-tech people that already dig Amazon will tend to buy the Fire, and those that prefer B&N will buy the Nook- in which case, Amazon will clean house by default.
They've been really smart: just the term Kindle is virtually synonymous in many people's minds for a tablet you read books and maybe do other stuff with. Everything else exists in some other product universe. It barely registers for many that they could buy an iPad or (even less) a Transformer and read the same content with it as the Kindle.
Anyone else find it ironic that the most successful Android tablets are and will be the ones that are of the "Android but not Android" variety?
Anyone else find it ironic that the most successful Android tablets are and will be the ones that are of the "Android but not Android" variety?
Anyone else find it ironic that the most successful Android tablets are and will be the ones that are of the "Android but not Android" variety?
Anyone else find it ironic that the most successful Android tablets are and will be the ones that are of the "Android but not Android" variety?
What good is the cloud storage when you go places where you don't have wifi?
Or when Amazon can just go in and delete your books
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html
Settlement and changes aside its something to keep in mind
