Why do the makers of LCDs not like to advertise panels by their grade and then price them accordingly? I'm no business expert, but I think that it could be hurting their profits because people who don't like to take risks just won't buy one at all. In addition to that, I'd pay a lot extra to know beforehand that I got the highest grade panel and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Although I guess this question could technically apply to anything that's binned, the LCD makers abuse the ability to bin as much as anyone (with the possible exception of Chrysler in the past) IMO. They don't tell how good the power circuitry is (like the make, model, and specifications of the caps they use), they usually don't tell how long the backlight is supposed to last, they often don't tell you the AWG of the power cord, and they never tell you how much input lag @ 60Hz there is.
Perhaps I'm just PO'ed because there are no existing displays that I find satisfactory, but we all know how hard it is for me to understand the viewpoint different from the one I hold.
Although I guess this question could technically apply to anything that's binned, the LCD makers abuse the ability to bin as much as anyone (with the possible exception of Chrysler in the past) IMO. They don't tell how good the power circuitry is (like the make, model, and specifications of the caps they use), they usually don't tell how long the backlight is supposed to last, they often don't tell you the AWG of the power cord, and they never tell you how much input lag @ 60Hz there is.
Perhaps I'm just PO'ed because there are no existing displays that I find satisfactory, but we all know how hard it is for me to understand the viewpoint different from the one I hold.