Not saying you're wrong ..... BUT .....CDC concerned data might be misrepresented because a bunch of dishonest actors will absolutely continue to misrepresent data? Like the "Johns Hopkins study"?
Parasite treatment with potential placebo effect is more accurate.Horse medicine for the horse-faced!
CDC published estimates of flu deaths that were quite high for years(probably to hustle vaccine shots)....yet never were lockdowns implemented. COVID eclipsed those "estimates" with real kills.
Parasite treatment with potential placebo effect is more accurate.
Actually, people who jump on the "horse medicine" train are an embodiment of "smart stupidity".
I mean, FWIW, it's not an account that had just lain dormant, there's been a sprinkling of posts over the years in various topics. Nothing in this thread is inconsistent with the poster's general past behavior.Not saying you're wrong ..... BUT .....
Arguing with these twits/shill's propaganda-posts only lends them credibility.
EDIT: And before anyone questions the "shill" label in the above post, what OTHER possible explanation is there for a lurker who joined in 2006 with less then 800 total posts DEDICATING itself to posting misleading bull$hit on this topic in this thread and elsewhere? (remember what Hermann Goering said!)
Not implying this account was hijacked like the majority of the "lifer/spambot" posts in OT.... more like these scumbags are being "recruited" by the right to "influence" opinion.I mean, FWIW, it's not an account that had just lain dormant, there's been a sprinkling of posts over the years in various topics. Nothing in this thread is inconsistent with the poster's general past behavior.
Thanks for reinforcing my point.NYT direct link - The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects
The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations and, until recently, wastewater analyses.
“Tell the truth, present the data,” said Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert and adviser to the Food and Drug Administration. “I have to believe that there is a way to explain these things so people can understand it.”
More likely that data will indicate more expansive and expensive defensive protocols/changes in living(like eating better) beyond vaccination and a tight, more paranoid "code of conduct" more sensible than the "vaccinated and you're a free bird" principle the government hoped would work. The vaccine simply wasn't the condom they hoped it was.
I find it difficult to understand the logic behind wanting less data, especially when it is official government data. But many statements here seem to defy logic.
The data that showed virus mutation and leaky vaccines was available very early on, but the narrative marched and did so with a blind passion.
Understanding that phenomenon is proving far from simple. Hope is not a strategy.
This looks like good reporting by the NY Times. Not to defend the clown based on many of his other posts, but not sure how this particular one supports the proposition that he's a shill?Thanks for reinforcing my point.
(anyone paying one of these clowns is getting ripped off... if you folks are fine being tools in some kind of amateur info-war then keep entertaining these tools)
No .... hence the "getting ripped off" comment.This looks like good reporting by the NY Times. Not to defend the clown based on many of his other posts, but not sure how this particular one supports the proposition that he's a shill?
Are you really saying someone is paying him to post a NYT article?
Yesterday at Costco was the lowest mask wearing I've seen yet. About 75 to 80% wearing masks