Svnla
Lifer
- Nov 10, 2003
- 17,986
- 1,388
- 126
I might be nuts but that second shot of pfizer hurt a helluva lot more than the first one.
Oh great, my 2nd shot of Pfizer will be next week. <sad panda>
I better update my will, just in case.
I might be nuts but that second shot of pfizer hurt a helluva lot more than the first one.
I expect that Bourla is right and we'll want boosters late this or early next year. Not a major inconvenience.
I also saw him quoted on reddit but forgot to bookmark the link, about how they are looking at this and pitching this to investors as a repeating revenue stream.
I also saw him quoted on reddit but forgot to bookmark the link, about how they are looking at this and pitching this to investors as a repeating revenue stream.
It's less of a puzzle than was thought at the time. They had tons of SARS-CoV-2 spread, but they simply didn't have the surveillance testing to know about it. Subsequent antibodies testing (this is a few months back) revealed very high prevalence of infections. Although the virus was spreading like wildfire, they weren't seeing waves of severe outcomes like say in Brazil. One unconfirmed theory is that Indians have some unknown partial immunity from past coronavirus exposure.Bit scary how new infections have taken off like a rocket in India. There was a lot of discussion a little while ago about the puzzle of how they'd come right down, and what were Indians doing right to achieve this....but before anyone seemed to answer that question, the case numbers shot way, way, up again.
With it rampaging through a large population like that, surely there's a high chance of new variants emerging?
Oh great, my 2nd shot of Pfizer will be next week. <sad panda>
I better update my will, just in case.
Because people probably go out and do this with friends, and people may not be very compliant about keeping their pods isolated. It seems for some areas, the soft-handed, personal responsibility approach is failing from a mitigation standpoint, so tougher measures need to be temporarily enacted.They're even banning camping. How the hell is camping a risk?
They're looking into a stricter lockdown here, even a curfew. They're even banning camping. How the hell is camping a risk? They did the same last year too. Starting to really question the motive behind all of this, I feel it's not just about the virus anymore. None of this actually helps stop the spread. Meanwhile they still allow risky jobs like warehouses and factories to operate, and still allow travel. The risky jobs are actually where lot of the cases have been happening.
![]()
BREAKING: All options, including curfew, 'on the table' for Ontario
Ford's cabinet has been meeting "regularly," and all options are "on the table," including a curfew, Solicitor General Sylvia Jones said on Thursday.thepostmillennial.com
Wish is was longer/better, but should be enough once we get past the current outbreaks.
A guy who came to put my toilet in had a bunch of them. I believe he was an EMT/firefighter so he was early in the line. Said they had a mix up so he got the first shot of pfizer or moderna, then went in and they missed the schedule so they gave him the other one and then he had a second shot of that later on.
I might be nuts but that second shot of pfizer hurt a helluva lot more than the first one.
Yeah, the first woman to ever get a COVID vaccine was just about one year ago today. It'll be September before we start getting meaningful data from a year out.It very well could be, just don't actually know yet. I think that the trial data is a little bit older, but I'm wondering if they want to wait for general population data before they say anything.
Anyway, the "sixth month effective" claim really only reflects the fact that this vaccine has been around for....about 6 months.
At least around here, people haven't been distancing at campgrounds at all. And then the sharing of bathrooms and shower halls. At the end of the day, the governments are trying to shut down the "low cost" things to shut down, camping, playgrounds, parks, etc but shut down a bar? Hell no, that's someone's company.They're looking into a stricter lockdown here, even a curfew. They're even banning camping. How the hell is camping a risk? They did the same last year too. Starting to really question the motive behind all of this, I feel it's not just about the virus anymore. None of this actually helps stop the spread. Meanwhile they still allow risky jobs like warehouses and factories to operate, and still allow travel. The risky jobs are actually where lot of the cases have been happening.
![]()
BREAKING: All options, including curfew, 'on the table' for Ontario
Ford's cabinet has been meeting "regularly," and all options are "on the table," including a curfew, Solicitor General Sylvia Jones said on Thursday.thepostmillennial.com
At least around here, people haven't been distancing at campgrounds at all. And then the sharing of bathrooms and shower halls. At the end of the day, the governments are trying to shut down the "low cost" things to shut down, camping, playgrounds, parks, etc but shut down a bar? Hell no, that's someone's company.
It very well could be, just don't actually know yet. I think that the trial data is a little bit older, but I'm wondering if they want to wait for general population data before they say anything.
Anyway, the "sixth month effective" claim really only reflects the fact that this vaccine has been around for....about 6 months.
Now we can be questioned if we're not at home. Just today some kids were told by police to stop playing on the trampoline in their own yard and to go inside, because some asshole neighbour ratted them out. This is getting beyond ridiculous at this point. Meanwhile all the high risk workplaces like warehouses, factories, airports etc are still open. This is really starting to feel like the rise of a police state.
I've never understood the "mono" part of the antibody treatments. Seems like they'd want it to be 4 or 5 different antibodies. Attacking just one spot is asking for the virus to mutate.The FDA has revoked the EUA for bamlanivimab when administered alone. It's a monoclonal antibody therapy. They cite ongoing analyses showing increases in variants that are resistant, resulting in treatment failure, and thus the benefits no longer outweigh the risks.
