Non-biased Sources

[mundania]

One of the things I've seen in the China v. US threads is the accusations of sources being biased.
Which sources do you think are the least biased, nationally and internationally?

I've heard Salon.com was pretty good. I also like the New York Times, but I've been starting to hear about how biased it is.

 

[Czar]

No source is unbiased, thats why you have to read all the sources and make up your own mind, sortof like hardware sites

 

[CichliSuite]

None.

That's why people should refrain from these extremist feelings since no one really knows the truth. And yes, I'm specifically referring to all the armchair military generals in here who think they know the "facts". You people are such sheep.

 

[palad]

I agree, there are no truly unbiased sources, and the worst offenders are usually those who calim to be unbiased. I remember reading an essay on this once, where it was worked out that the most reliable reporters are the ones who acknowledge they are biased and report as clearly as they can within those lines.

 

[woodie1]

Humans are by their nature biased. Try as we might to contain it it still sneaks out. Therefore, I don't see how any paper, magazine, site, etc. can be totally without some bias.

 

[Clinotus]

And consider that we are horrified by State sponser/owned media, but in America have not one problem with news conglomerates ......