Belegost
Golden Member
- Feb 20, 2001
- 1,807
- 19
- 81
It's not an issue of AT&T removing wireless charging feature by shaving costs on units.
The problem here is that a different US carrier has already paid Nokia to make that an "exclusive" feature for them and will market the hell out of it.
This happens all the time thanks to our carrier subsidy system.
One carrier offers wireless charging as an "exclusive" feature with gimped storage, while another carrier offers 32GB(rather than 16GB standard) as an exclusive feature for the same exact device on different carriers.
Is this really hostile towards their OWN customers? I'm sure one carrier(lets say Verizon) is looking out for it's best customers when it offers wireless charging as an "exclusive" feature while the other carrier(lets say AT&T) offers increased built in storage as an "exclusive" feature for the exact same device.
If the international version of these phones ship with wireless charging, then we know that both Nokia(which accepted the bribe) and the wireless carrier(which offered the bribe so they can market it as an a "exclusive" feature for them)
Perhaps you are privy to information that others don't have. But as it stands right now publically:
- the 1520 has been announced as an ATT exclusive.
- The ATT variant seems to drop both the wireless charging AND the storage
There has been nothing announced about VZW having this device, so at this point there is nothing to suggest some sort of tradeoff between carrier variants.
If Nokia signed exclusivity of wireless charging with VZW, well that sucks, but you may want to give a source, I certainly don't recall seeing anything about it.
That still has nothing to do with the storage, I can see no good reason to drop that except a few bucks off each part.
It also does not change my opinion (you are welcome to a differing opinion) that wireless carriers are among the most customer unfriendly businesses out there. Right next to cable companies.