- Oct 8, 2013
- 20
- 0
- 0
Hi guys, I need some help. I only have the option to choose in between these two CPU coolers in my country due to availability:
Noctua NH-D15 (I know it is better, the best of them all actually)
Dark Rock Pro 3
I will overclock an i7-3770K to 4.4Ghz or above. My Zalman 9900Nt is only properly handling 4.2Ghz and at the peak of the summer temperatures will rise another 5ºC or so.
The question is, the Noctua NH-D15 might not fit with my G-Skill Trident X 2400Mhz. If I take the memory fins (detachable), it comes down to 39mm. Noctua says the NH-D15 have 32mm clearance for memory. I can't raise the fan (it will barely fit my Carbide 300R, with 170mm clearance).
But here is the catch. The Dark Rock Pro 3 also states no room for the Trident X at 35mm memory clearance with the fan centered, but it fits: http://www.tweaktown.com/image.php?...n_terms_of_performance_and_quietness_full.jpg
How? Because people say the CPU raises the block 8mm and the memory slot raises the memory 3mm approximately. If you do the math, you have 5mm extra to fit the memory.
If this is correct, unless the motherboard of the TweakTown test is different from all the rest, I am assuming the Noctua NH-D15 will also have extra 5mm on top of the 32mm it states. The TweakTown photo seems to attest to that. Then I can spare a millimeter or two according to a guy who says the Dark Rock Pro 3 leaves 5mm to spare from the side panel of a Carbide 300R (I have the same case). The Noctua is slightly bigger, but it will have a couple millimeters to spare as well.
I know the Dark Rock Pro 3 is a safe bet and it can handle 4.4Ghz, but I hate to pass on a real performer like the NH-D15. And I might even try to run it with 4.6Ghz, which the Dark Rock Pro 3 might not handle properly. Sometimes I do video rendering and the CPU usage gets pretty high.
Anyone with a Noctua NH-D15 that can attest 37mm clearance for the memory? Or maybe Noctua states 32mm already taking into account the 5mm extra? I am not sure.
-I just bought the Trident X and I am in love with it, stable as a rock at 2400Mhz, so I won't buy another low profile set.
-I don't like water coolers (mostly noise and mechanical / parts problems).
-I don't want to spend money in another case (they are getting quite expensive here, especially bigger cases).
As you guys can see, I did my homework as best as I could, but I have no way of knowing if Noctua is taking into account the CPU bump or not.
Some tests vary the performance of the Dark Rock Pro 3, but maybe I will be on the safe zone from 4.4 to 4.6Ghz. And it is quite cheaper (good deal) than the Noctua. But who knows...
I appreciate any help.
Contiusa.
Noctua NH-D15 (I know it is better, the best of them all actually)
Dark Rock Pro 3
I will overclock an i7-3770K to 4.4Ghz or above. My Zalman 9900Nt is only properly handling 4.2Ghz and at the peak of the summer temperatures will rise another 5ºC or so.
The question is, the Noctua NH-D15 might not fit with my G-Skill Trident X 2400Mhz. If I take the memory fins (detachable), it comes down to 39mm. Noctua says the NH-D15 have 32mm clearance for memory. I can't raise the fan (it will barely fit my Carbide 300R, with 170mm clearance).
But here is the catch. The Dark Rock Pro 3 also states no room for the Trident X at 35mm memory clearance with the fan centered, but it fits: http://www.tweaktown.com/image.php?...n_terms_of_performance_and_quietness_full.jpg
How? Because people say the CPU raises the block 8mm and the memory slot raises the memory 3mm approximately. If you do the math, you have 5mm extra to fit the memory.
If this is correct, unless the motherboard of the TweakTown test is different from all the rest, I am assuming the Noctua NH-D15 will also have extra 5mm on top of the 32mm it states. The TweakTown photo seems to attest to that. Then I can spare a millimeter or two according to a guy who says the Dark Rock Pro 3 leaves 5mm to spare from the side panel of a Carbide 300R (I have the same case). The Noctua is slightly bigger, but it will have a couple millimeters to spare as well.
I know the Dark Rock Pro 3 is a safe bet and it can handle 4.4Ghz, but I hate to pass on a real performer like the NH-D15. And I might even try to run it with 4.6Ghz, which the Dark Rock Pro 3 might not handle properly. Sometimes I do video rendering and the CPU usage gets pretty high.
Anyone with a Noctua NH-D15 that can attest 37mm clearance for the memory? Or maybe Noctua states 32mm already taking into account the 5mm extra? I am not sure.
-I just bought the Trident X and I am in love with it, stable as a rock at 2400Mhz, so I won't buy another low profile set.
-I don't like water coolers (mostly noise and mechanical / parts problems).
-I don't want to spend money in another case (they are getting quite expensive here, especially bigger cases).
As you guys can see, I did my homework as best as I could, but I have no way of knowing if Noctua is taking into account the CPU bump or not.
Some tests vary the performance of the Dark Rock Pro 3, but maybe I will be on the safe zone from 4.4 to 4.6Ghz. And it is quite cheaper (good deal) than the Noctua. But who knows...
I appreciate any help.
Contiusa.
Last edited: