- May 29, 2003
- 18,526
- 5
- 0
Originally posted by: Duddy
I do believe there is a shortage in specialized tech fields.
The "help and support" crowd is uber large for sure.
But there is a shortage of people who have useful tech skills, like VBscripting for example. You would be surprised how many IT people have no idea how to script. Also, MS Exchange specialists are in high demand in nearly EVERY corporation.
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
I'd rather hire someone young and train them with the proper skills than to pay big money for someone who think they're the shiz and sit around all day doing nothing.
Originally posted by: Rudee
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
I'd rather hire someone young and train them with the proper skills than to pay big money for someone who think they're the shiz and sit around all day doing nothing.
Problem is large companies don't have time to babysit young workers who lack experience. My company rarely hires Engineers right out of College or University, as they prefer to get people in who have a minimum experience level and require less hand holding.
Originally posted by: Duddy
I do believe there is a shortage in specialized tech fields.
The "help and support" crowd is uber large for sure.
But there is a shortage of people who have useful tech skills, like VBscripting for example. You would be surprised how many IT people have no idea how to script. Also, MS Exchange specialists are in high demand in nearly EVERY corporation.
EDIT: And the web and graphics design crowd doesn't count for anything, because any 14 year old with a mac can master either or both of those fields.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Duddy
I do believe there is a shortage in specialized tech fields.
The "help and support" crowd is uber large for sure.
But there is a shortage of people who have useful tech skills, like VBscripting for example. You would be surprised how many IT people have no idea how to script. Also, MS Exchange specialists are in high demand in nearly EVERY corporation.
The reason the help and support crowd is huge is because we're a service economy and on-site labor is needed to fix things. After car design and manufacturing are long gone from the US, mechanics will still be needed. After programming is done overseas, desktop support people will be needed onsite to support them. After computer hardware is made overseas, you'll still need people here to repair/replace stuff when things go wrong.
A guy in India can make the program your company wants.
A factory in China can make the computer your company buys. But they won't be able to walk up to someone's desk in Philly and install it.
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: Duddy
I do believe there is a shortage in specialized tech fields.
The "help and support" crowd is uber large for sure.
But there is a shortage of people who have useful tech skills, like VBscripting for example. You would be surprised how many IT people have no idea how to script. Also, MS Exchange specialists are in high demand in nearly EVERY corporation.
EDIT: And the web and graphics design crowd doesn't count for anything, because any 14 year old with a mac can master either or both of those fields.
Are we relegating specialized IT talent to scripting?! If that were all that was needed in IT, we'd all be in trouble.
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Duddy
I do believe there is a shortage in specialized tech fields.
The "help and support" crowd is uber large for sure.
But there is a shortage of people who have useful tech skills, like VBscripting for example. You would be surprised how many IT people have no idea how to script. Also, MS Exchange specialists are in high demand in nearly EVERY corporation.
The reason the help and support crowd is huge is because we're a service economy and on-site labor is needed to fix things. After car design and manufacturing are long gone from the US, mechanics will still be needed. After programming is done overseas, desktop support people will be needed onsite to support them. After computer hardware is made overseas, you'll still need people here to repair/replace stuff when things go wrong.
A guy in India can make the program your company wants.
That's a misrepresentation of the actual facts.
The scare about India (Russia, China and all the other countries that accept outsourcing software work; even Indian companies outsource their own work to these countries in some cases) is practically a myth.
It's taken over a decade for companies to understand how to truly employ offshore talent, and most still don't get it right. Software has never been the manufacturing equivalent of a specification that can be built in isolation; it's an evolving product that unfortunately requires a vast number of iterations and complex interactions before it can be delivered. There are some very limited exceptions, but this is the truth for the vast majority, and it's why so many offshore efforts have failed miserably.
What companies are learning is that offshore talent helps adjunct onshore efforts, and it's the shortage of talent to facilitate this onshore-offshore interaction that leads to increased demand for two types of people: One, H1B workers to get them onshore; two, onshore workers to liaise between business and tech. The latter group has been in shortage for some time now.
A factory in China can make the computer your company buys. But they won't be able to walk up to someone's desk in Philly and install it.
Correct, but you're speaking from a simple break-fix standpoint. Software is obviously much more layered than simply having someone on the ground for break-fix.
Originally posted by: Rudee
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
I'd rather hire someone young and train them with the proper skills than to pay big money for someone who think they're the shiz and sit around all day doing nothing.
Problem is large companies don't have time to babysit young workers who lack experience. My company rarely hires Engineers right out of College or University, as they prefer to get people in who have a minimum experience level and require less hand holding.
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Rudee
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
I'd rather hire someone young and train them with the proper skills than to pay big money for someone who think they're the shiz and sit around all day doing nothing.
Problem is large companies don't have time to babysit young workers who lack experience. My company rarely hires Engineers right out of College or University, as they prefer to get people in who have a minimum experience level and require less hand holding.
The company can either pay to train them or pay them more after they've been trained somewhere else. It seems like a lot of companies don't want to do either.
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
I'd rather hire someone young and train them with the proper skills than to pay big money for someone who think they're the shiz and sit around all day doing nothing.
When you hire someone, they were given a list of roles and responsibilities. If they are assigned additional responsibilities, should they not be entitled to more compensation?Originally posted by: kt
So you hire someone young and train them properly. They got all the skills they need to get better pay, what do you think they will do next? They will either ask for better pay where they are, or they will get better pay somewhere else now that they have the skills.
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Where I work, we've had multiple positions open for about a year because the right fit has not been found.
Originally posted by: her209
When you hire someone, they were given a list of roles and responsibilities. If they are assigned additional responsibilities, should they not be entitled to more compensation?Originally posted by: kt
So you hire someone young and train them properly. They got all the skills they need to get better pay, what do you think they will do next? They will either ask for better pay where they are, or they will get better pay somewhere else now that they have the skills.
Originally posted by: Duddy
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Rudee
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
I'd rather hire someone young and train them with the proper skills than to pay big money for someone who think they're the shiz and sit around all day doing nothing.
Problem is large companies don't have time to babysit young workers who lack experience. My company rarely hires Engineers right out of College or University, as they prefer to get people in who have a minimum experience level and require less hand holding.
The company can either pay to train them or pay them more after they've been trained somewhere else. It seems like a lot of companies don't want to do either.
That's the main problem with the tech industry.
You can't get a job without prior experience. You can't get prior experience without a job.
Even smaller companies want you to have atleast 2-3 years in your field. But then you can never actually get INTO the field.
Originally posted by: Duddy
... like VBscripting for example. You would be surprised how many IT people have no idea how to script.