- Dec 13, 2013
- 13,990
- 180
- 106
The way I understand it is that it's never been about whether or not women can do the job, they can, it's just that we know what can happen to women soldiers that get taken prisoner.
The way I understand it is that it's never been about whether or not women can do the job, they can, it's just that we know what can happen to women soldiers that get taken prisoner.
Did you read the article?
If that's directed to me, yes I did and I happen to think it's wrong. Why do you ask?
Concerning the Kurdish women that is probably asymmetric warfare and was also self defense. They were probably not carrying any significant load when they were fighting. Not only can men carry a heavier load but they can also move more quickly and farther in military operations. The question is not can women fight but can they do it as well as men.
And there is another question. We already have a huge problem with PTSD and other psychological problems with soldiers as it is now. Do you want to force men to go through the experience of witnessing women they know shot and blown up right in front of them?
You already force them to go through the experience of witnessing men they know shot and blown up right in front of them. A body is a body, and a friend is a friend, and a partner is a partner. What do different sex organs have to do with anything?
Yep, you just go ahead and downplay what the female Kurdish fighters have done/are doing. Seems to me, they're 'walking the walk' right now and I doubt they give a damn about your opinions on their fighting abilities. I doubt the men that they're fighting alongside give a damn either.
The same things that can, and do, happen to male soldiers that get taken prisoner.
The same things that can, and do, happen to male soldiers that get taken prisoner.
Ya right pal. Once again, American topic that won't effect anyone outside our borders being trolled by the Canadian.