No Country For Old Men

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,667
6,551
126
I was pretty excited to see this flick and it was sold out at the initial show I wanted to see, so we had to see it an hour and a half later. I really didn't know it would be compoletely sold out all night since it's limited right now and I just did not think many people knew about it.

I must say after I saw it I was slightly disappointed. It started out very good and it just seemed to get progressively slower as it went on and on. The main gad guy is a complete badass and the acting in the movie is great. There was some great dialog in the movie as well.

And the end, while I won't get into it, was pretty disappointing.

I do however like how this movie was anything but "being hollywood" with it's story telling.

All in all I would say if you were excited about seeing it, go see it, but if you were up in the air, wait for DVD.
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
I loved the movie including the ending.

I think it's a stroke of brilliance and definitely the most memorable and haunting movies of 2007. I saw it Friday night and I still can't stop thinking about it
 

whistleclient

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2001
2,700
1
71
Originally posted by: Platypus
I loved the movie including the ending.

I think it's a stroke of brilliance and definitely the most memorable and haunting movies of 2007. I saw it Friday night and I still can't stop thinking about it

QFT.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,667
6,551
126
Originally posted by: Platypus
I loved the movie including the ending.

I think it's a stroke of brilliance and definitely the most memorable and haunting movies of 2007. I saw it Friday night and I still can't stop thinking about it

The more and more I thought about it aftwrards, the more and more I liked it. kind of like another ending of something else ;)

But at the same time, towards the end of the movie it felt like it was just dragging on and on and I was just waiting for it to end kind of. And then it just did.
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
A friend of mine and I usually hook up to see Coen movies when they come out, so I'm probably not going to see it for a few weeks. :(
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
This isn't directed at the OP or anything but I think if people were disappointed by the end of the film then they were following the wrong subject in the film. A lot of times people focus on what they preceive to be the subject of a movie and get disappointed when they realize that said subject was just a catalyst to further the actual subject/message. This is very true of this movie in particular.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,667
6,551
126
Originally posted by: Platypus
This isn't directed at the OP or anything but I think if people were disappointed by the end of the film then they were following the wrong subject in the film. A lot of times people focus on what they preceive to be the subject of a movie and get disappointed when they realize that said subject was just a catalyst to further the actual subject/message. This is very true of this movie in particular.

**** POSSIBLE SPOILERS *****

I can agree to that. From the name of the movie itself you can kind of tell what it's about when you realize that Tommy Lee Jones just cannot hang with the way crimes are being committed. And then at the end when he's retired you just get the feeling that he knew it was his time to get out of what he used to be good at because he hasn't changed well with the times and can't do it anymore.

Is that the story line you are referring to? I also missed the scene where Woody Allen was introduced (came back mid-way through that scene) so I didn't understand his character 100%, but I was thinking he was basically just like Anton was, like he was supposed to get this money for that head hancho, however the head hancho was pissed cause Anton was making a mess while getting the money back.
 

AUMM

Diamond Member
Mar 13, 2001
3,029
0
0
i saw it yesterday as well, my opinion was pretty much identical.... excellent acting and characters, but i felt at some points the story was dragging or lacking substance....overall a pretty interesting movie...
 

Platypus

Lifer
Apr 26, 2001
31,046
321
136
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Platypus
This isn't directed at the OP or anything but I think if people were disappointed by the end of the film then they were following the wrong subject in the film. A lot of times people focus on what they preceive to be the subject of a movie and get disappointed when they realize that said subject was just a catalyst to further the actual subject/message. This is very true of this movie in particular.

**** POSSIBLE SPOILERS *****

I can agree to that. From the name of the movie itself you can kind of tell what it's about when you realize that Tommy Lee Jones just cannot hang with the way crimes are being committed. And then at the end when he's retired you just get the feeling that he knew it was his time to get out of what he used to be good at because he hasn't changed well with the times and can't do it anymore.

Is that the story line you are referring to? I also missed the scene where Woody Allen was introduced (came back mid-way through that scene) so I didn't understand his character 100%, but I was thinking he was basically just like Anton was, like he was supposed to get this money for that head hancho, however the head hancho was pissed cause Anton was making a mess while getting the money back.

more spoilers

Hmm.. I think we have different views of the story line here. Remember that scene with TLJ and the man in the wheelchair? TLJ complains that he can't keep up with the way criminals are today and the old man corrects him and tells him that story about the man getting gunned down on his porch. The message is that true evil/crime never really changes but it's the person that changes as time goes on. He even says something like 'to assume the world waits for you is vanity.'

TLJ's character is just burned out after all he's seen but as the old man illustrated, this is nothing new hence the name of the film. Woody Harrelson (not allen :) ), Anton, Llewellyn, etc all represent different takes on this message.

Anton represents pure, unfiltered madness in my opinion. Woody's explanation of him is exactly spot on. He follows rules that are above money/drugs and everything else. He relies on pure chance and the honesty of someone's word as his motivations in life and that's precisely why he never dies in the movie. He represents the evil in the world. The flip of the coin scene in the beginning and at the end is exactly illustrating this point. Both Llewelyn's wife and the drunk lady with the beer at the hotel explain that you can't wait for things to happen to you, that they just do... another main point of the film. Woody's character represented logic/reason to me. He calls Anton out for what he is and even tries to explain to Llewelyn what he's dealing with and the boss guy in the building. This is further brought home with the reappearing line 'you don't have to do this' that both Woody and later Llewelyn's wife repeats to him. The car scene is another perfect illustration of the element of chance. Anton 's character is definitely personified as evil in my opinon based on the above and also the fact that he always shows up at the right place at the right time. He even calmly fixes himself after getting attacked and makes every move calculated and precise. There is no logic at all to him, no reason, but he abides by the simple rules Woody illustrated in the first scene with him.

Llewelyn represented the opposite in my opinion and that's why he wasn't killed by Anton and he's the only one to actually hurt him. He represents the cavalier spirit of a young man fighting the evil before he 'grows old' like TLJ and loses site of the bigger picture

Then the very non-subtle issue of the blood money and how it destroys everyone who touches it except Anton. Notice how the exchange of bloody 100 dollar bills always occured but Anton is the only one to exchange one without dying? First Llewelyn with buying that kid's shirt with one and later the same with Anton buying the young boy's shirt. I thought it was even more clever how the first time it happens after Llewelyn gets shot the kid asks him if he was in a car wreck; awesome irony for the later scene.

The entire movie was summed up perfectly by the latter dream TLJ told his wife about with his father on the horse. How he was older than his father was, etc. That was a brilliant way to end in my opinion. The message I got from the entire film was basically one of hopelessnes and despair which was why it was so haunting to me. It is brutally honest and perfectly illustrates what happens to you as time goes on and as you grow older. It was a window into reality with no sugar coating and no explanation for why.

I have a theory about Woody's line about the building missing a floor and the way that Llewelyn was found but I can't quite seem to connect it yet. I need to see it again and think about it more. It has something to do with the 13.

Anyway that is my take on it, probably not perfect but I'd have to rewatch it a few times to really develop these theories more.
 

maziwanka

Lifer
Jul 4, 2000
10,415
1
0
Originally posted by: Platypus
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Platypus
This isn't directed at the OP or anything but I think if people were disappointed by the end of the film then they were following the wrong subject in the film. A lot of times people focus on what they preceive to be the subject of a movie and get disappointed when they realize that said subject was just a catalyst to further the actual subject/message. This is very true of this movie in particular.

**** POSSIBLE SPOILERS *****

I can agree to that. From the name of the movie itself you can kind of tell what it's about when you realize that Tommy Lee Jones just cannot hang with the way crimes are being committed. And then at the end when he's retired you just get the feeling that he knew it was his time to get out of what he used to be good at because he hasn't changed well with the times and can't do it anymore.

Is that the story line you are referring to? I also missed the scene where Woody Allen was introduced (came back mid-way through that scene) so I didn't understand his character 100%, but I was thinking he was basically just like Anton was, like he was supposed to get this money for that head hancho, however the head hancho was pissed cause Anton was making a mess while getting the money back.

more spoilers

Hmm.. I think we have different views of the story line here. Remember that scene with TLJ and the man in the wheelchair? TLJ complains that he can't keep up with the way criminals are today and the old man corrects him and tells him that story about the man getting gunned down on his porch. The message is that true evil/crime never really changes but it's the person that changes as time goes on. He even says something like 'to assume the world waits for you is vanity.'

TLJ's character is just burned out after all he's seen but as the old man illustrated, this is nothing new hence the name of the film. Woody Harrelson (not allen :) ), Anton, Llewellyn, etc all represent different takes on this message.

Anton represents pure, unfiltered madness in my opinion. Woody's explanation of him is exactly spot on. He follows rules that are above money/drugs and everything else. He relies on pure chance and the honesty of someone's word as his motivations in life and that's precisely why he never dies in the movie. He represents the evil in the world. The flip of the coin scene in the beginning and at the end is exactly illustrating this point. Both Llewelyn's wife and the drunk lady with the beer at the hotel explain that you can't wait for things to happen to you, that they just do... another main point of the film. Woody's character represented logic/reason to me. He calls Anton out for what he is and even tries to explain to Llewelyn what he's dealing with and the boss guy in the building. This is further brought home with the reappearing line 'you don't have to do this' that both Woody and later Llewelyn's wife repeats to him. The car scene is another perfect illustration of the element of chance. Anton 's character is definitely personified as evil in my opinon based on the above and also the fact that he always shows up at the right place at the right time. He even calmly fixes himself after getting attacked and makes every move calculated and precise. There is no logic at all to him, no reason, but he abides by the simple rules Woody illustrated in the first scene with him.

Llewelyn represented the opposite in my opinion and that's why he wasn't killed by Anton and he's the only one to actually hurt him. He represents the cavalier spirit of a young man fighting the evil before he 'grows old' like TLJ and loses site of the bigger picture

Then the very non-subtle issue of the blood money and how it destroys everyone who touches it except Anton. Notice how the exchange of bloody 100 dollar bills always occured but Anton is the only one to exchange one without dying? First Llewelyn with buying that kid's shirt with one and later the same with Anton buying the young boy's shirt. I thought it was even more clever how the first time it happens after Llewelyn gets shot the kid asks him if he was in a car wreck; awesome irony for the later scene.

The entire movie was summed up perfectly by the latter dream TLJ told his wife about with his father on the horse. How he was older than his father was, etc. That was a brilliant way to end in my opinion. The message I got from the entire film was basically one of hopelessnes and despair which was why it was so haunting to me. It is brutally honest and perfectly illustrates what happens to you as time goes on and as you grow older. It was a window into reality with no sugar coating and no explanation for why.

I have a theory about Woody's line about the building missing a floor and the way that Llewelyn was found but I can't quite seem to connect it yet. I need to see it again and think about it more. It has something to do with the 13.

Anyway that is my take on it, probably not perfect but I'd have to rewatch it a few times to really develop these theories more.

i like all this, but i just want to make sure i don't get "too caught up" in theories with this film.

it was definitely enjoyable and definitely different from most other movies.
 

Mucho

Guest
Oct 20, 2001
8,231
2
0
This is a very interesting thread. I've seen all the Coen Brothers' movies, now I just have to see this one.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,667
6,551
126
Originally posted by: Platypus
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Platypus
This isn't directed at the OP or anything but I think if people were disappointed by the end of the film then they were following the wrong subject in the film. A lot of times people focus on what they preceive to be the subject of a movie and get disappointed when they realize that said subject was just a catalyst to further the actual subject/message. This is very true of this movie in particular.

**** POSSIBLE SPOILERS *****

I can agree to that. From the name of the movie itself you can kind of tell what it's about when you realize that Tommy Lee Jones just cannot hang with the way crimes are being committed. And then at the end when he's retired you just get the feeling that he knew it was his time to get out of what he used to be good at because he hasn't changed well with the times and can't do it anymore.

Is that the story line you are referring to? I also missed the scene where Woody Allen was introduced (came back mid-way through that scene) so I didn't understand his character 100%, but I was thinking he was basically just like Anton was, like he was supposed to get this money for that head hancho, however the head hancho was pissed cause Anton was making a mess while getting the money back.

more spoilers

Hmm.. I think we have different views of the story line here. Remember that scene with TLJ and the man in the wheelchair? TLJ complains that he can't keep up with the way criminals are today and the old man corrects him and tells him that story about the man getting gunned down on his porch. The message is that true evil/crime never really changes but it's the person that changes as time goes on. He even says something like 'to assume the world waits for you is vanity.'

TLJ's character is just burned out after all he's seen but as the old man illustrated, this is nothing new hence the name of the film. Woody Harrelson (not allen :) ), Anton, Llewellyn, etc all represent different takes on this message.

Anton represents pure, unfiltered madness in my opinion. Woody's explanation of him is exactly spot on. He follows rules that are above money/drugs and everything else. He relies on pure chance and the honesty of someone's word as his motivations in life and that's precisely why he never dies in the movie. He represents the evil in the world. The flip of the coin scene in the beginning and at the end is exactly illustrating this point. Both Llewelyn's wife and the drunk lady with the beer at the hotel explain that you can't wait for things to happen to you, that they just do... another main point of the film. Woody's character represented logic/reason to me. He calls Anton out for what he is and even tries to explain to Llewelyn what he's dealing with and the boss guy in the building. This is further brought home with the reappearing line 'you don't have to do this' that both Woody and later Llewelyn's wife repeats to him. The car scene is another perfect illustration of the element of chance. Anton 's character is definitely personified as evil in my opinon based on the above and also the fact that he always shows up at the right place at the right time. He even calmly fixes himself after getting attacked and makes every move calculated and precise. There is no logic at all to him, no reason, but he abides by the simple rules Woody illustrated in the first scene with him.

Llewelyn represented the opposite in my opinion and that's why he wasn't killed by Anton and he's the only one to actually hurt him. He represents the cavalier spirit of a young man fighting the evil before he 'grows old' like TLJ and loses site of the bigger picture

Then the very non-subtle issue of the blood money and how it destroys everyone who touches it except Anton. Notice how the exchange of bloody 100 dollar bills always occured but Anton is the only one to exchange one without dying? First Llewelyn with buying that kid's shirt with one and later the same with Anton buying the young boy's shirt. I thought it was even more clever how the first time it happens after Llewelyn gets shot the kid asks him if he was in a car wreck; awesome irony for the later scene.

The entire movie was summed up perfectly by the latter dream TLJ told his wife about with his father on the horse. How he was older than his father was, etc. That was a brilliant way to end in my opinion. The message I got from the entire film was basically one of hopelessnes and despair which was why it was so haunting to me. It is brutally honest and perfectly illustrates what happens to you as time goes on and as you grow older. It was a window into reality with no sugar coating and no explanation for why.

I have a theory about Woody's line about the building missing a floor and the way that Llewelyn was found but I can't quite seem to connect it yet. I need to see it again and think about it more. It has something to do with the 13.

Anyway that is my take on it, probably not perfect but I'd have to rewatch it a few times to really develop these theories more.

great explanation :thumbsup:

i must admit though, the scene where he was talking to the old man I kind of zoned out. That was one of the parts of the movie where I was kind of ready for something to happen and just kind of drifted out of the movie.

the same thing at the end, I honestly was not paying that much attention to the dialog between him and his wife. I was also coming down from quite a few drinks at dinner beforehand which made my attention span a little less than usual.

i definitely want to catch it again on dvd though whenever it comes out.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
This was the second worst movie I have ever seen. First worst was in the same year, called Atonement. What a crackshit year of movies. The fact that this won best picture, and the killer guy got best supporting actor for speaking 2 lines, epitomizes how out of touch hollywood is nowadays. They try so hard to be different that they fuck up a potentially good movie by straying away from the traditional format. Pathetic.
 

PottedMeat

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
12,363
475
126
Originally posted by: JS80
This was the second worst movie I have ever seen. First worst was in the same year, called Atonement. What a crackshit year of movies. The fact that this won best picture, and the killer guy got best supporting actor for speaking 2 lines, epitomizes how out of touch hollywood is nowadays. They try so hard to be different that they fuck up a potentially good movie by straying away from the traditional format. Pathetic.

The 'traditional' format is predictable and boring. What's the point in formulaic crap?

 
Nov 5, 2001
18,366
3
0
Originally posted by: JS80
This was the second worst movie I have ever seen. First worst was in the same year, called Atonement. What a crackshit year of movies. The fact that this won best picture, and the killer guy got best supporting actor for speaking 2 lines, epitomizes how out of touch hollywood is nowadays. They try so hard to be different that they fuck up a potentially good movie by straying away from the traditional format. Pathetic.

this post epitomizes how out of touch you are with reality. I hope you enjoy your Blu-Ray of Alvin and the Chipmunks.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Originally posted by: JS80
This was the second worst movie I have ever seen. First worst was in the same year, called Atonement. What a crackshit year of movies. The fact that this won best picture, and the killer guy got best supporting actor for speaking 2 lines, epitomizes how out of touch hollywood is nowadays. They try so hard to be different that they fuck up a potentially good movie by straying away from the traditional format. Pathetic.

So you've only seen 2 movies your entire life? I can't see how any sane person that has seen more than 3 or 4 movies can say NCFOM is the second worst movie they have ever seen.

KT
 

Baked

Lifer
Dec 28, 2004
36,052
17
81
No Country For Old Man is 100x better than There Will Be Blood. TWBB is full of fail it would go straight to video if Daniel Day-Lewis wasn't in it.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,455
19,923
146
Yep. It's anti-climatic... but when you think about it... so is real life.

This movie had a uniquely deep evil about it. The evil was so artistically portrayed as to make an impression on this old man (me) in a way no other movie has ever done.

I give it two thumbs up.
 
Nov 5, 2001
18,366
3
0
Originally posted by: Baked
No Country For Old Man is 100x better than There Will Be Blood. TWBB is full of fail it would go straight to video if Daniel Day-Lewis wasn't in it.

I agree TWBB was overrated. It had promise, but became a trainwreck in execution.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Originally posted by: Baked
No Country For Old Man is 100x better than There Will Be Blood. TWBB is full of fail it would go straight to video if Daniel Day-Lewis wasn't in it.

Good lord. So much fail in the movie reviewing department here today.

KT
 

ggnl

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2004
5,095
1
0
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: JS80
This was the second worst movie I have ever seen. First worst was in the same year, called Atonement. What a crackshit year of movies. The fact that this won best picture, and the killer guy got best supporting actor for speaking 2 lines, epitomizes how out of touch hollywood is nowadays. They try so hard to be different that they fuck up a potentially good movie by straying away from the traditional format. Pathetic.

this post epitomizes how out of touch you are with reality. I hope you enjoy your Blu-Ray of Alvin and the Chipmunks.

Yup, this is why Michael Bay will never be out of work.