Jeffwo

Platinum Member
Mar 2, 2001
2,759
0
76
This ($65.00) is all I need to spend right now and considering I am running a 32mb. M64
it'll be a step up for me. Not a real gamer anyway.

Jeff
 

NuclearFusi0n

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2001
7,028
0
0
if you dont game, have you thought about getting a matrox or a low end ATI card? The 2d quality on that gf2 will be horrible
 

element2k5

Senior member
Aug 19, 2001
683
0
0
i would get the x-tacy.... just because i think they have better cards...
i dont like mobo manufacturers making my video products....
 

Booster

Diamond Member
May 4, 2002
4,380
0
0


<< if you dont game, have you thought about getting a matrox or a low end ATI card? The 2d quality on that gf2 will be horrible >>



I don't agree. I don't see any difference between the GF2 2D and a Radeon. Many say the Radeon's 2D is better, but I don't see it. ATI also has problems with drivers. Of those two cards I'd go with MSI. They're known to make decent video cards at low prices.
 

Jeffwo

Platinum Member
Mar 2, 2001
2,759
0
76
Anybody else? Has anyone used either of these 2? I have got to get this order in the mail...not interested in shopping for other brands.

Jeff
 

Migroo

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2001
4,488
9
81
If you dont game then get a Matrox or an ATi card. I can see the difference in 2D quality.

Theres nothing wrong with gaming with ATi cards anyway! :)
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Well, I wouldn't get an MX at all if I were you. If I were to choose one of those, I would get the GeForce2 MX400 64MB - but that's because I'm a gamer.

nik