NJ Gov Christie reneges on law he signed for more pension funding. Courts say it's ok

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
except what I said was true. You are pretending that I said stuff I didn't. You are pretending you had never heard of him referred to as not a republican.

I'm done playing make believe with you people. If you want to debate facts, fine. But I'm not taking Trolly to see the King with you.

You are making such a ridiculous argument. Doesn't matter who refers to him as what. Bottom Line is he is a Republican.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,153
6,317
126
You are making such a ridiculous argument. Doesn't matter who refers to him as what. Bottom Line is he is a Republican.

I think Christy is a bull frog. I can easily argue that he's not a Republican because he's not toady enough. The only thing about my argument, though, would be that I wouldn't take it seriously. Christy and my ego aren't having an identity crisis and I'm not feeling a victim today. I'm wondering if I have ever seen it rain before here in California in June. Something seems odd about the weather these days.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Good, public employees are going to have to learn that they cant rape the public with endless tax increases.
 
Dec 10, 2005
24,963
8,180
136
Good, public employees are going to have to learn that they cant rape the public with endless tax increases.
Why is it the worker's fault for demanding what they were promised? They held up their end of the bargain by working for the state. The state's end was to pay salary and pension. If the state couldn't afford it, they should have stopped offering such pensions in the first place. As it stands now, the state is effectively stealing from the workers by reneging on pensions.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,862
7,395
136
You are making such a ridiculous argument. Doesn't matter who refers to him as what. Bottom Line is he is a Republican.

Sorry to say but, if he were a REAL Republican, New Jersey would already have enacted one of those disingenuously titled "Voter Rights" laws that is blatantly biased against poor, minority and young Democrat voting folks, it would also be one of those union crushing "Right to Work" states, huge tax cuts for the rich would have put New Jersey in an even deeper financial crisis than any Repub controlled rural state that is "experimenting" with the time honored Reganesque trickle down theory of voodoo economics, New Jersey would have been deregulated to the point of it being a mere state-government-in-name-only that's actually being run by the folks who REALLY know how to bleed it dry without making things look that way..... oh wait, that part is mostly true; Christie, you get a break on that one.

In other words, if Christie was a REAL Republican then he'd have every person that's a resident in that state convinced that Obama is the card carrying commie-fascist muslim terrorist loving Kenyan born anti-American nation-destroying Satan worshiping monster that every loyal and true Repub either knows him to be or is wishing really really hard that allllll of the aforementioned is really true despite the facts proving otherwise.

Anyway, I think that's what is meant by those loyalist of loyal Tea Party patriot REAL Americans who know-for-a-fact that Christie's conservative pedigree papers are as fake as Obama's birth certy.

To them Christie makes Romney look like the progeny of a heavenly blessed one night tryst between Rush Limbaugh and Jan Brewer.......well, to you or myself that may seem kind'a horrific, but to a REAL Repub, who knows eh? ;)
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
Sorry to say but, if he were a REAL Republican, New Jersey would already have enacted one of those disingenuously titled "Voter Rights" laws that is blatantly biased against poor, minority and young Democrat voting folks, it would also be one of those union crushing "Right to Work" states, huge tax cuts for the rich would have put New Jersey in an even deeper financial crisis than any Repub controlled rural state that is "experimenting" with the time honored Reganesque trickle down theory of voodoo economics, New Jersey would have been deregulated to the point of it being a mere state-government-in-name-only that's actually being run by the folks who REALLY know how to bleed it dry without making things look that way..... oh wait, that part is mostly true; Christie, you get a break on that one.

In other words, if Christie was a REAL Republican then he'd have every person that's a resident in that state convinced that Obama is the card carrying commie-fascist muslim terrorist loving Kenyan born anti-American nation-destroying Satan worshiping monster that every loyal and true Repub either knows him to be or is wishing really really hard that allllll of the aforementioned is really true despite the facts proving otherwise.

Anyway, I think that's what is meant by those loyalist of loyal Tea Party patriot REAL Americans who know-for-a-fact that Christie's conservative pedigree papers are as fake as Obama's birth certy.

To them Christie makes Romney look like the progeny of a heavenly blessed one night tryst between Rush Limbaugh and Jan Brewer.......well, to you or myself that may seem kind'a horrific, but to a REAL Repub, who knows eh? ;)

I'll let the Republicans decide who is fit to wear that title. I generally think the majoroty of Republicans are off the reservations. But being not a Real Republican still doesn't make you a Democrat. It simply makes you not a Real Republican.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,862
7,395
136
I'll let the Republicans decide who is fit to wear that title. I generally think the majoroty of Republicans are off the reservations. But being not a Real Republican still doesn't make you a Democrat. It simply makes you not a Real Republican.

So should we all. :thumbsup:
 

Mai72

Lifer
Sep 12, 2012
11,562
1,741
126
Christy has told the teacher's union that he will put the pension issue on the ballot box, but every time the teacher's union declines. I wonder why? Could it be they would get their ass handed to them? Many homeowners in NJ have a very negative towards the NJEA and their croonies.

Could it be that they have gone after pay raises when everyone else was cutting back?
Could it be that we pay the highest property taxes in America?
Could it be that they only care about themselves?

Now, the unions have to concede. They lost. They need to restructure the pension system, because pigs will fly before NJ taxpayers cover this pension fiasco.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
Why is it the worker's fault for demanding what they were promised? They held up their end of the bargain by working for the state. The state's end was to pay salary and pension. If the state couldn't afford it, they should have stopped offering such pensions in the first place. As it stands now, the state is effectively stealing from the workers by reneging on pensions.

To be fair, the state probably didn't "offer" it. The public union most likely demanded something, anyone involved that had a few neurons to rub together knew wasn't feasible long term, and both sides eventually agreed because the people involved knew they wouldn't be around when the train came off the tracks.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Why is it the worker's fault for demanding what they were promised? They held up their end of the bargain by working for the state. The state's end was to pay salary and pension. If the state couldn't afford it, they should have stopped offering such pensions in the first place. As it stands now, the state is effectively stealing from the workers by reneging on pensions.

Is that your attitude when it's government spending you don't like? Say, a defense contractor that runs a few billion over budget on an acquisition program. Did you stand up for the guys selling the $600 hammers and $5K toilet seats because the government agreed to it and said "well, they should just stop agreeing to buy $600 hammers", or do you slam them for taking advantage of taxpayers?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Is that your attitude when it's government spending you don't like? Say, a defense contractor that runs a few billion over budget on an acquisition program. Did you stand up for the guys selling the $600 hammers and $5K toilet seats because the government agreed to it and said "well, they should just stop agreeing to buy $600 hammers", or do you slam them for taking advantage of taxpayers?

You do love false equivalency.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
To be fair, the state probably didn't "offer" it. The public union most likely demanded something, anyone involved that had a few neurons to rub together knew wasn't feasible long term, and both sides eventually agreed because the people involved knew they wouldn't be around when the train came off the tracks.

That's not really true. Failure to fund the pension fund adequately over many years, as promised, is the reason for the current situation. Christie correctly identifies it a sins of the past coming up to bite them in the ass. OTOH, he doesn't want to spread the pain past public employees, either. Why would he? Public employees have been thoroughly demonized as the bad guys so he has every right-think reason to toss 'em right under the bus.

Christine Whitman set it in motion 20 years ago-

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2011/03/07/doesnt-anyone-remember-christine-whitman/177285

She started looting the pension fund to serve the usual Repub agenda of tax cuts, but, uhh, nevermind that, right? Asking folks who've benefited from that to suffer part of the pain would obviously be too much to ask, particularly with public employees all lined up & bent over for the grand cornholio.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,016
36
86
"The court’s majority, writing in a 5-2 decision, found the state needed to honor its obligations to retirees, but that a pension law signed by the administration wasn’t an enforceable contract."

HowTF is that even legal?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,517
15,399
136
"The court’s majority, writing in a 5-2 decision, found the state needed to honor its obligations to retirees, but that a pension law signed by the administration wasn’t an enforceable contract."

HowTF is that even legal?

It's called having your cake and eating it too. Or all bark and no bite.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
"The court’s majority, writing in a 5-2 decision, found the state needed to honor its obligations to retirees, but that a pension law signed by the administration wasn’t an enforceable contract."

HowTF is that even legal?

My understanding is that per the state constitution, such a spending increase is only legal if passed via voter referendum.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Why is it the worker's fault for demanding what they were promised? They held up their end of the bargain by working for the state. The state's end was to pay salary and pension. If the state couldn't afford it, they should have stopped offering such pensions in the first place. As it stands now, the state is effectively stealing from the workers by reneging on pensions.

If the unions didn't lobby the shit out of the state to get their "promises" (aka, buying votes) then they wouldn't get them, would they?

Taxpayers simply cannot afford what was promised, period. Get in line with the rest of us and be at risk for having your 401k go down in value.