Nissan 350Z GT-S

[MasterAndCommander]

Text

I'd rather wait for the Nissan 450Z ...if I was in a market for such a vehicle.
No replacement for displacment 😀...yeah, I'm old skool 😎

 

[MixMasterTang]

Originally posted by: MasterAndCommander
Text

I'd rather wait for the Nissan 450Z ...if I was in a market for such a vehicle.
No replacement for displacment 😀...yeah, I'm old skool 😎

"Nissan has not announced performance figures for the GT-S, but it expects the car to crack 0-62mph in 5.8 seconds." That just doesn't sound too impressive. I'm pretty sure a stock 350z can do that.

 

[InlineFour]

i'd rather wait for the skyline.

 

[AdamK47]

375hp and still slow.

 

[tfinch2]

0-62 in 5.8? LOL

If I had 375 HP, I'd be embarassed by that number.

 

[Demo24]

I read somewhere else that it will be a secound or so faster to 60 than the stock 350z.

 

[Demon-Xanth]

Originally posted by: tfinch2
0-62 in 5.8? LOL

If I had 375 HP, I'd be embarassed by that number.

A '95 Camaro Z28 w/ 275HP did it in that time.

 

[hoorah]

Originally posted by: tfinch2
0-62 in 5.8? LOL

If I had 375 HP, I'd be embarassed by that number.

Camaros and Mustangs have solid rear axles, which are orders of magnitude better for drag launching.

For everything else, there is independant rear suspension.

 

[GuitarDaddy]

Originally posted by: MixMasterTang

Originally posted by: MasterAndCommander
Text

I'd rather wait for the Nissan 450Z ...if I was in a market for such a vehicle.
No replacement for displacment 😀...yeah, I'm old skool 😎

"Nissan has not announced performance figures for the GT-S, but it expects the car to crack 0-62mph in 5.8 seconds." That just doesn't sound too impressive. I'm pretty sure a stock 350z can do that.

No kidding, my Impala SS which must be quite a bit heavier and only has 303hp does 5.7? I would think a Z with 375hp should easily do sub 5 secs.

 

[Demo24]

they messed up in the article, suppose to be 4.8sec from what i read