Idk if it's coming up on your browser the same way, but if you don't see the article, scroll down to find it.
http://www.slate.com/id/2154157/
http://www.slate.com/id/2154157/
Which is why I could hit one-handed home runs without winding up or following through.
So you're saying a flick of the wrist is better compared to the pressing of a button. Same crap to me. No skill.Originally posted by: tfinch2
Which is why I could hit one-handed home runs without winding up or following through.
Seems better than hitting one-finger home runs just by pressing a button.
Originally posted by: VIAN
So you're saying a flick of the wrist is better compared to the pressing of a button. Same crap to me. No skill.Originally posted by: tfinch2
Which is why I could hit one-handed home runs without winding up or following through.
Seems better than hitting one-finger home runs just by pressing a button.
Originally posted by: LanceM
Originally posted by: VIAN
So you're saying a flick of the wrist is better compared to the pressing of a button. Same crap to me. No skill.Originally posted by: tfinch2
Which is why I could hit one-handed home runs without winding up or following through.
Seems better than hitting one-finger home runs just by pressing a button.
If you want a true test of your baseball skills, go play baseball.
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Took the words right out of my mouth. If you want to measure your IRL skill, do it IRL. Gaming is to have fun.
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Took the words right out of my mouth. If you want to measure your IRL skill, do it IRL. Gaming is to have fun.
Isn't it supposed to be immersive though? Flicking my wrist isn't very immersive. I don't think anyone's asking for perfect emulated sensations from whacking a ball with a bat, just a bit more sensory data to be taken into account to determine the swing.
Originally posted by: tfinch2
It's more immersive than the opposition, is it not?
No, because there is a difference between practicality and gimmick. You'll be disappointed that what you've seen from Nintendo's marketing, isn't how the game is actually played.Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Took the words right out of my mouth. If you want to measure your IRL skill, do it IRL. Gaming is to have fun.
Isn't it supposed to be immersive though? Flicking my wrist isn't very immersive. I don't think anyone's asking for perfect emulated sensations from whacking a ball with a bat, just a bit more sensory data to be taken into account to determine the swing.
It's more immersive than the opposition, is it not?
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Also from Slate: The Wii is better than either the Xbox360 or the PS3
How is that not a strong argument? Just because that doesn't appeal to you personally doesn't mean it's not a strong argument for the system. That sounds like exactly what Nintendo was shooting for. A system that appeals to the average gamer. The hardcore gamer is becoming a smaller and smaller segment of total revenue every year.Originally posted by: VIAN
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Also from Slate: The Wii is better than either the Xbox360 or the PS3
Not a very strong arguement:
"Twilight Princess is fun, and worth picking up if you have a Wii, but it's not the gaming revolution augured by Wii Sports. While the controls in Zelda feel novel, my instant take is that the 360 and PS3 will probably be better consoles for epic single-player games. But for short bursts of gaming activity or for playing with a group, the Wii will probably be your best bet. I plan to pack up my Wii and play it with my extended family during the Thanksgiving holiday. I'm confident even the gaming-phobes will love it."