• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nikon Users - What are you using for Macro and Wide Angle?

S

Sid59

Lifer
Macro and Wide Angle are two lenses missing from my bag. What are you guys using?

I hear a lot of good things about the Tokina 11-16, your opinions? What are people using?

The only macro lens I think is worth it's weight is the 105 Micro. Are there better 3rd party lenses?

Thanks!

Edit: I'm on a D90. For some reason, i have this urge to wait on the P7000 reviews and pick it up as a PS, it'll have the manual controls, WA and macro all in one and my SO can use it too.
 
Last edited:
tokina 11-16 is effing amazing.

for macro, i use the 50mm 1.8 with extension tubes.
i'd like the 105, but have better things to be spending my money on right now (WSM, d7000, kids college)
 
troytime said:
tokina 11-16 is effing amazing.

for macro, i use the 50mm 1.8 with extension tubes.
i'd like the 105, but have better things to be spending my money on right now (WSM, d7000, kids college)
Click to expand...

Can you link to some of your shots, it's alwasy nice to see user photos and not marketing/promo pictures.

I guess one of my unwarranted worries is the Tokina is DX, not that i have tons of DX lenses (18-200 and 35) but it'd be nice to have some lenses not DX limited.
 
i use the nikon 105 for macro (non VR) I have a 17-35 as my widest lens, depending on what i pick up for a new body FF/APS-C will determin which of the ultra wides i purchase

i would REALLY want the Nikon 200 F/4 macro, anyone want to help me rob a 7/11?
 
I have a D90 with a tokina 11-16mm. I got the lens back in early August and at first I wasn't too impressed with the shots the lens took for my taste. It was sharp and great IQ, but I figured it wasn't for me. I wasn't going to sell the lens, but I figured it would not be used often enough either.

That all changed when I was in NYC on 9/11 to take photos of the tribute lights. Just wow, some and most of my best/favorite shots was with that Tokina. I have some from the top of the Empire State Building. Even without the use of a tripod (they confiscated mine), the shots came out great.

I can't help on the macro lens as I have yet to have a need for one.

I hope this helps.
 
Tokina 12-24 and Nikkon 10.5 fish for my wide angle needs. Love 'em both. I really want a macro lens, but not enough to spend money on one. Anybody feel like gifting one to me? 🙂
 
nice thanks all, it sounds like the Tokina 11-16 lives up to the hype. Probably my next lens, i know Ken Rockwell is hit/miss and a bit exaggerated on his reviews but he likes the Tokina.

I want a WA more than a macro, now to find 500USD in change.
 
One thing about the macro: If you're going to be using it as a dedicated macro lens, you could go for an older manual-focus Nikkor macro, which should be substantially cheaper. I don't know the market for used Nikon lenses, so I could be wrong here. But I can tell you for a fact that my Canon 100Macro stays in MF mode 100% of the time when I'm using it for macro shooting. Set it to 1:1, and then move back and forth to get focus (if handheld); or get the framing set up, and set the focus manually (if using a tripod).
 
I have the Sigma 10-20mm EX (the 11-16 was nowhere to be found at the time), and it's served me very well.

For macro, I use the Sigma 70-300mm APO in macro mode, but man do I want a real macro lens.
 
the new sigma 8-16 appears to be better than the tokina, but I haven't used one.

I do mostly architecture and urban stuff, so I have a small pile of wides:

14-24 2.8
20 2.8 AIS
24 PCE
AI'd 28 f/2
AI'd 35 F/2

The 14-24 gets the most use, even on a crop body it's better than any other wide I've used (which includes the nikon 12-24 and many others), with the exception of the zeiss 21. The 24 PCE probably has slightly better color and sharpness, but is only practical on a full frame camera AND when you have the time to get everything perfect.

The 28 f/2 is a great lens for the price - not especially wide on a crop sensor but a great small lens.

The 20 f/2.8 is very well made but awfully distorted compared to the above three. I bought it used because I liked having a crop body wide that didn't take up much space, but I never use it. I'm getting ready to sell it and the 35 f/2 to go towards either a fisheye or a telephoto.
 
Nikon 105VR is my favorite lens ever (not that I've owned much expensive glass). As others have said, for macro, VR stays off and autofocus often stays off.
 
Using 14-24 2.8 and 105 vr macro on my d300/d700 bodies. Although can't take a filter, the sharpest/best contrast UWA I've ever used! Even canonites are caught using it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top