As a D610 owner, I'm obviously biased.
I do wonder how the rational goes from "can't afford the D750, but will substitute with the D7200" when the D610 is damn near the same price as the D71200.
This line of thinking isn't unique here - I've seen it used before.
What is the D610 lacking that the D71/200 brings you back? -- FPS? 1/8000 shutter?
In my mind at least.... my eventual goal is to have a nice FX and a nice DX. The 750 is my target FX and the 7200 is my target DX. Given the funds for each, and the fact I have a d3200 and a d5000 the cheaper upgrade at the moment is to a 7200. This upgrade would (IMO) help me considerably.
