- Feb 7, 2011
- 762
- 0
- 0
The Nikon Df IS the pretty girl. I want one of those so bad.
me too .. it's steep but that's a given considering it's FX and retro, those 2 things drive the cost. I know a lot of people say at the price point, they'd rather have a D800 but ... sweet jesus the DF is nice.
http://photographylife.com/nikon-df-vs-d800
If I didn't already have a D600 I would probably consider it. As it is now I can't justify spending that much for what is mostly a side grade at best and downgrade at worse featurewise.
I don't think this is a side- / down-grade. It has the weather sealing of the D800 and the internals of a D4. That's pretty good in my opinion.
I have no intention of replacing my D600 with one of these, but if I could afford it / justify it, I would.
I don't understand the point of this camera. Why not just update the D700 to D710 and be done with it?
Oh, and here are your pretty girls, JR. I opened that video to see a couple things about the camera, and I had to rewatch it about 3 times before I was actually able to focus on the camera...
Nice effort by Nikon but:
2. No viewfinder, yes, yes, yes. No need for a viewfinder here. I don't remember having one on F4s and my picture taking adventure was fine and very enjoyable. Provide this as an option perhaps for cry babies who "must" have it.
Oh, and here are your pretty girls, JR. I opened that video to see a couple things about the camera, and I had to rewatch it about 3 times before I was actually able to focus on the camera...