Nice "Relief" work UN, two thumbs up!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

nonlnear

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2008
2,497
0
76
I love bashing the UN, but I prefer to reserve my criticism for real issues.

Seriously, boats make a lot of sense for housing a large influx of foreign workers, and all civilian boats outfitted for housing have "nice" interiors. What are you proposing? That they lay cots out on the decks of freighters and shower with fire hoses?
 

DesiPower

Lifer
Nov 22, 2008
15,299
740
126
I love bashing the UN, but I prefer to reserve my criticism for real issues.

Seriously, boats make a lot of sense for housing a large influx of foreign workers, and all civilian boats outfitted for housing have "nice" interiors. What are you proposing? That they lay cots out on the decks of freighters and shower with fire hoses?


There are several shelters for relief workers on land in protected areas where majorityof the relief workers, close to 10,000 live. It simply not sensible to spend 5mil a month to house some 700 ppl...

The WFP is renting the 286-foot, 5,000-ton Sea Voyager (capacity: about 220 passengers) for $35,000 per day, plus a whopping additional $5,000 daily for fuel. Total for 90 days: $3,600,000.

If every cabin were full, the average daily cost to the U.N. for the fully-loaded Sea Voyager would be about $181.81 per passenger — minus the $40 or $20 paid by each U.N. staffer who stays in a cabin.

The 480-foot, 11,000-ton Ola Esmeralda — which now operates directly under the administrative auspices of MINUSTAH — is renting for $72,500 per day, all costs included.

Total for 90 days: $6,525,000. Average cost per passenger per day (the vessel accommodates 470 plus crew): about $154.25, minus the staff contributions.

Over the lives of their respective 90-day initial contracts, that brings the total outlay for the ships to $112,500 per day, or $10,125,000, minus the staff shares.

Each of the boats also has a number of single-month renewal options in its contract, which will push those totals higher. A WFP spokesman says, however, that the organization's aim is to end its charter of Sea Voyager at the end of April. That would bring the total rental cost of that vessel to $4,800,000, minus staff contributions.

Found outrage yet?
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Just think of it as corporate welfare. No one has enough money to actually go on a cruise right now.
 

nonlnear

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2008
2,497
0
76
I didn't say I liked it, but honestly $7k/month per person is doing pretty good for the UN. Compare that to what they spend on hotels at some conferences and they're getting 30 days for the price of 2. :D
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
There are several shelters for relief workers on land in protected areas where majorityof the relief workers, close to 10,000 live. It simply not sensible to spend 5mil a month to house some 700 ppl...



Found outrage yet?
No and I was really looking.
 

Matthiasa

Diamond Member
May 4, 2009
5,755
23
81
There are several shelters for relief workers on land in protected areas where majorityof the relief workers, close to 10,000 live. It simply not sensible to spend 5mil a month to house some 700 ppl...



Found outrage yet?

Yup $180 a day per person is like a ton.... wait no it isn't.
Could they do better yes much so, but that isn't horrible.
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Think how pissed the OP would be if he knew Brownie and FEMA paid $236 Million for cruise ship lodging that looks to have had less than 50% occupancy.





--
 

woolfe9999

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2005
7,153
0
0
Think how pissed the OP would be if he knew Brownie and FEMA paid $236 Million for cruise ship lodging that looks to have had less than 50% occupancy.

--

The $236 million for half empty cruise ships is susiciously high. Clearly, the cruise ships cost a lot less, while the remaining funds are being diverted to fund secret FEMA concentration camps. Now there's some real outrage!

- wolf
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
So they should have housed them on the ground where they'd spend 90% of their time sick with dysentery?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.