Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Of course, the GeForce FX may be pretty darned fast when it arrives. The benchmarks will tell that story. Also, of course, ATI may have a faster variant of the Radeon 9700 on store shelves before the GFFX arrives. But now that we've had a real whiff of the GeForce FX vapors, the reality is clear: this concoction isn't potent enough to freeze the market for four to six months. If you want a next-gen graphics card now, you might as well go pick up a Radeon 9500 or 9700 and start enjoying it right away.
vs.
This,
I'm a techno-geek and even though it pains me, I'm going to hold-out for the FX. Why? Because the thing looks pretty darn impressive on paper, that's why, and at prices around the $400 mark, I don't want to gamble that the investment I make is going to be the wrong one. Nvidia has a solid track-record, one that converted me from an ATI fanboy to an Nvidia fanboy, and I'm not about to admit I made a mistake by betting on Nvidia until I see all the cards actually on the table so I can make my own comparison. I'm not going to make a move now because I don't really know if anybody is bluffing, so I'll just "call" and wait for the rest of the hand to be played out.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.