• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

nforce5

hotlips69

Member
Does anyone have any news on when the nforce5 series is going to be announced as it's been over a year since the nforce4 series came out.

 
New chipsets don't come out all that often. If I had to guess, I'd say we'll see nforce5 around the same time that we see Socket M2 Athlon 64's.
 
I would think maybe socket M2 might lead to a change of chipset, but whether this will also lead to an updated nomenclature is anyones guess.
They did change 3 -> 4 for 754 -> 939 though, so I guess maybe 4 -> 5 for 939 to M2 (940)
 
Stop taking the p*ss...

I didn't even realise that I had posted in bold originally and it was a genuine question as I don't know if its worth waiting a while longer before my major mobo upgrade?
 
Originally posted by: BigCoolJesus
Originally posted by: wafflesandsyrup
Originally posted by: Bigsm00th
Originally posted by: krnxpride83
Originally posted by: Bigsm00th
does making an entire post bold somehow convey your thoughts better?

WOW I CAN TYPE IT BOLD!

OMFG BOLD AND ITALICS!!!!@!

😕!!!

:cookie: !!!!!!!11111!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!1


bold, italics, highlight and underline........yay

Yeah, I should to that. more often. :evil:
 
Originally posted by: Lonyo
I would think maybe socket M2 might lead to a change of chipset, but whether this will also lead to an updated nomenclature is anyones guess.
They did change 3 -> 4 for 754 -> 939 though, so I guess maybe 4 -> 5 for 939 to M2 (940)
No they didn't. I'm typing this on a Socket 939 nForce3 Ultra system.
 
Originally posted by: hotlips69
Does anyone have any news on when the nforce5 series is going to be announced as it's been over a year since the nforce4 series came out.

March 16th 2006.
 
No they didn't. I'm typing this on a Socket 939 nForce3 Ultra system.

Right, the main difference between the nforce3 versus nforce4 is that the nf4 has PCI-E, while the nf3 has AGP/PCI.

However, socket M is going to use DDR2 memory, and it would seem like this would force a similar revision of the chipset (although maybe not due to the integrated memory controller).
 
Originally posted by: Some1ne
No they didn't. I'm typing this on a Socket 939 nForce3 Ultra system.

Right, the main difference between the nforce3 versus nforce4 is that the nf4 has PCI-E, while the nf3 has AGP/PCI-E.

However, socket M is going to use DDR2 memory, and it would seem like this would force a similar revision of the chipset (although maybe not due to the integrated memory controller).

Exactly, the chipset doesn't matter as long as the CPU still uses a HyperTransport link to communicate with the chipset.
 
Originally posted by: MDE
Originally posted by: Some1ne
No they didn't. I'm typing this on a Socket 939 nForce3 Ultra system.

Right, the main difference between the nforce3 versus nforce4 is that the nf4 has PCI-E, while the nf3 has AGP/PCI-E.

However, socket M is going to use DDR2 memory, and it would seem like this would force a similar revision of the chipset (although maybe not due to the integrated memory controller).

Exactly, the chipset doesn't matter as long as the CPU still uses a HyperTransport link to communicate with the chipset.
The mobo layouts would have to get re-worked though and a new BIOS written to deal with whatever changes the memory controller brings(ala nForce 3's and Rev. E CPUs). So it will take some work, but otherwise there's no good reason to replace the nForce 4 chipset at this point, especially now that there's the dual-16x variant on the way.
 
Back
Top