eh, there was definitely a time...like 3 solid years...where Rivers was a legit top 5 QB; though those days are long past. Indy actually should be much improved over last year, though.
You want a worse team than the Vikes (i think you're exaggerating a bit, but whatever)--look at the Lions or even the Bears. I mean....what team wouldn't prefer a Cousins, all his faults, over a dingus like Trubisky?
Also: Cleveland.
Maybe. I agree, Detroit and Cleveland are strong contenders for the worst team, but the Bears are 2 and 0.
Cousins vs Trubisky?? I honestly dont know. Trubisky makes a lot of bad throws, but he also makes some good ones, and is much more mobile than Cousins. I also think Trubisky still has some upside, while with Cousins, what he is, is pretty much all you are going to get. Other than lacking the ability to really take over a game, the problem I have with Cousins is the 3 year extension they gave him after one bad year and one pretty good one. Definitely should have waited until after this season to extend him, and well as Zimmer and Speilman.
With all the losses on defense and Diggs on offense, the Vikings are basically in a rebuilding year, which I could handle. However, it doesnt make sense to give your QB an expensive 3 year extension and then blow up the rest of the team.
Edit: I agree Rivers was at one time a very good QB, and I have been a fan of his. He somewhat reminds me of Cousins on steroids though. Always put up great numbers, but somehow could never take his team over the top. At the stage of his career he is in now, though, a good defense should have certainly given him much more challenge than the Vikes did.