K8T800 Vs. nForce3 150
Above we saw the nForce3 150 board from Shuttle easily outstrip the VIA K8T800 board from MSI in every single benchmark. At first we were a bit unsure, but the picture becomes quite clear once you see the full data sets from the entire review and have had some time to spend with all of the hardware. It's our opinion that we are seeing the score differences because of the superior IDE implementation by NVIDIA. NVIDIA has had issues with their IDE drivers for well over a year now with their nForce2 line, and some of those problems have followed over to the nForce3. With that said, NVIDIA has devoted huge resources to fixing these issues and we think that the IDE driver of NVIDIA has simply been tweaked to perform much better than the VIA IDE implementation.
There is always another side of the story though. Currently we can crash every nForce3 board we have possession of, both retail and engineering samples, when running extreme IDE traffic. We are also hearing that this is why some Taiwanese board companies are going with the VIA solution instead of the NVIDIA nForce3. We've received new drivers here recently, but we haven't had time to test them out to see if the stability has gotten any better. We will surely be looking at this soon, as we are testing retail nForce3 150 and Pro boards.
We could not get the nForce3 board to complete even one successful benchmark run of 3DMark2001. Manipulating drivers and DX9 versions did little to help and this issue has not yet been resolved.