Nexus (4?) - Next Nexus Phone

Discussion in 'Mobile Devices & Gadgets' started by Dominato3r, Aug 10, 2012.

  1. Dominato3r

    Dominato3r Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,114
    Likes Received:
    1
    Has anyone heard anything about the next Nexus phone? This is usually when names/chassis/some specs start to slip out in time for a possible mid October reveal

    The last thing I heard was that there were going to be 4 or 5 Nexus phones released at the same time. Each of which were going to be targeting different price models, and that Samsung was going to have the "main" phone.
     
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - Nexus Nexus Phone Forum Date
    nexus 5x bugs... anyone have these issues? why can't google make a phone that does the basics right Mobile Devices & Gadgets Oct 15, 2016
    Why can't my 3G Nexus 7 tablet be a phone? Mobile Devices & Gadgets Jul 27, 2016
    looking for midrange phone w/fingerprint unlock. Nexus 5x? iPhone SE? Mobile Devices & Gadgets Mar 28, 2016
    Project Fi and the new Nexus phones Mobile Devices & Gadgets Aug 26, 2015
    Nexus 6 - Opened my eyes to big phones Mobile Devices & Gadgets Mar 5, 2015

  3. T_Yamamoto

    T_Yamamoto Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    13,860
    Likes Received:
    9
    Don't know. Don't care.
    Its going to be called a nexus ____
     
  4. gorcorps

    gorcorps aka Brandon

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    29,681
    Likes Received:
    156
    If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all
     
  5. Dulanic

    Dulanic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2000
    Messages:
    9,242
    Likes Received:
    12
    How insightful, what made you open a thread about something you don't know or care about?

    Anyways. now that I'm done venting about the trolling... It's all speculation. I want to know, but am not going to put any faith in rumors out there.
     
  6. Skurge

    Skurge Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,195
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope it uses the new exynos 5 chipset and not end up being underpowered on lunch like the gnex

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
     
  7. OBLAMA2009

    OBLAMA2009 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,577
    Likes Received:
    1
    the galaxy s 3 just came out so there is no need for a new nexus device. what could they really add that isnt in that phone, especially once they release the galaxy s 3+ quad core version and jelly bean
     
  8. Skurge

    Skurge Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Same could be said about the s2. The galaxy Nexus came out. The nexus phones are basically reference devices.

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
     
  9. Headcase_Fargone

    Headcase_Fargone Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    388
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pentaband unlocked sets? On-screen buttons? Vanilla JB?

    There are reasons some of us are still on a Galaxy Nexus and not on the S3.
     
  10. Bitek

    Bitek Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2001
    Messages:
    4,823
    Likes Received:
    133
    Plus the vzw s3 is still locked down. You wonder if Vzw will even skip the nexus again.
     
  11. zsdersw

    zsdersw Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    10,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Gnex is not at all underpowered. Jellybean flies on it... faster than the newest phones with ICS.
     
  12. zsdersw

    zsdersw Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    10,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you don't care, why did you bother posting in this thread? :rolleyes:
     
  13. s44

    s44 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    9,339
    Likes Received:
    2
    Nexus DEVICES, not just phones. So we've already had two of them released (sort of): the 7 and the Q.
     
  14. bonkers325

    bonkers325 Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2000
    Messages:
    13,078
    Likes Received:
    1
    Galaxy Nexus Infinity Plus 4G
     
  15. iahk

    iahk Senior member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2002
    Messages:
    707
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yea, those jokes don't exactly work with Nexus devices as they've never used those names. Nexus One, Nexus S, Galaxy Nexus, Nexus 7, Nexus Q.
     
  16. DLeRium

    DLeRium Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Messages:
    20,114
    Likes Received:
    2
    It's underpowered because the Exynos chipset was faster. Furthermore, the GNex was released on the cusp of the release of quad core phones. Like the Nexus S, it was the last of it's era (single core, dual core) and was about to be surpassed.

    I don't doubt Jellybean flies. Would you say Windows Phones are not underpowered because the OS flies?

    Obviously some stupidity went on under the table with TI and Google. Who uses OMAP anyway? MotoFail? Samsung and HTC certainly don't use OMAP. They should've picked a chipset that's representative of the market. Snapdragon or Exynos would've been logical choices.
     
  17. zsdersw

    zsdersw Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    10,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    When ICS on a new phone like the SGS3 runs slower than Jellybean on the GNex, guess what... the GNex isn't underpowered, whether or not you agree.

    And yes, I would say that of WP.
     
  18. Red Storm

    Red Storm Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,358
    Likes Received:
    28
    Galaxy Nexus was/is a dev phone, it presented a hardware performance target that app devs could aim for with ICS. It was never meant to be a high end flagship using the latest and greatest, and having said that I have no performance issues with my Nexus.
     
  19. Ravynmagi

    Ravynmagi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    0
    To me when you say "under powered" that implies not enough power to operate the phone. And that would be inaccurate with the Galaxy Nexus or those single core Windows Phone 7s. Just because it's not running the latest quad core doesn't equate it to being under powered.
     
  20. Ravynmagi

    Ravynmagi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    0
    We won't see the next Nexus phone until Key Lime Pie is ready and I doubt that is coming this year. Probably won't be until sometime in early 2013 before we see the next Nexus and Android.
     
  21. DLeRium

    DLeRium Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Messages:
    20,114
    Likes Received:
    2
    Comparison of ICS on SGS3 vs. Jellybean on GNex is pretty unfair. Jellybean by default should be faster due to project butter. You're handicapping the SGS3 with ICS. How does this make a fair comparison? Then there's 2 different chipsets and quad vs dual core.

    How is WP underpowered if it runs smoothly?

    What is YOUR definition of underpowered? To you the GNex isn't underpowered because JellyBean flies but Windows Phone isn't?


    Well I wouldnt' say there isn't enough horsepower to operate the phone. I didn't call it underpowered. Someone else did. However I did back them up saying they do have a point because:

    1) GNex was 720p but using the same GPU as a Nexus S
    2) SGS2 was more powerful.
    3) GNex was built at the end of dual core flagship phones. Quad cores were due out any second.
    4) It's not just the SGS2, the HTC Sensation and other devices from that era would've outdone the GNex.

    I think it's enough horsepower for most people, but as a phone built in October, yeah it's behind the times, considering the iPhone 4S steamrolls it in graphics performance.
     
    #20 DLeRium, Aug 10, 2012
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2012
  22. Chiropteran

    Chiropteran Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2003
    Messages:
    9,196
    Likes Received:
    37
    Number of cores is a poor measure of "faster". Isn't the US version Galaxy S3 with it's dual core faster than the quad core version?
     
  23. zsdersw

    zsdersw Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    10,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's not unfair at all. In both cases they're the newest versions of Android officially available for each device. It also proves the point that just throwing faster hardware at the problem is not ultimately the key to improving overall performance.

    It's not. When I said I would say that of WP I meant that I wouldn't say WP is underpowered, just as I said that of the GNex.

    "Underpowered", to me, means unable to run the software it comes with at an acceptable speed. Windows Phones and Jellybean-equipped Galaxy Nexus devices are not underpowered because their hardware can run the software at a more-than-just-acceptable speed.
     
    #22 zsdersw, Aug 10, 2012
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2012
  24. jiffylube1024

    jiffylube1024 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,430
    Likes Received:
    0
    People should quantify their statement that the GNex was underpowered at launch (usually compared to the Galaxy S II). This is mainly an issue for gaming and 3D apps, not in general phone UI. It's got the same CPU as the international Galaxy S2.
    -------

    The International (and much more powerful) Galaxy S II (GT-i9100) used the Exynos 4210 SoC. The 4210 contains the following:

    -Dual Core ARM Cortex A9 CPU's @ 1.2 GHz (1MB L2 cache, Dual Channel 32-bit LP-DDR2)
    -ARM Mali-400 MP GPU @ 275 MHz


    The Galaxy Nexus (i-9250) contains the following:

    -Dual Core ARM Cortex A9 CPU's @ 1.2 GHz (1MB L2 cache, Dual Channel 32-bit LP-DDR2)
    -PowerVR SGX 540 GPU @ 307 MHz



    The GNex hardware specs disappointed at launch because it used the dated PowerVR SGX 540 GPU. This is the same GPU that was in the 2010-era Samsung Galaxy S. Granted the GPU in the Galaxy S ran at only 200 MHz, meaning a >50% clock increase, but it's still dated compared to the powerful Mali 400.
    -------

    So, with that out of the way, yes the GNex has a weak GPU by today's standards, but the CPU is a perfectly capable dual core Cortex A9, the same CPU like most phones until recently, which have switched to either quad core A9's or dual core Qualcomm "Krait" Snapdragon S4's.

    By comparison, the North American Galaxy S II models (Galaxy S II "Skyrocket") is essentially a GNex flipped on its head, with a more powerful GPU (Adreno 220) but a weaker CPU, the Snapdragon S3.

    You can check the performance comparison of the chips in Anand's Galaxy S III review:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/6022/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review-att-and-tmobile-usa-variants/4
     
    #23 jiffylube1024, Aug 10, 2012
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2012
  25. Red Storm

    Red Storm Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,358
    Likes Received:
    28
    So do many other phones nowadays, but to what end? I have never once cared about how well my phone runs 3D benchmarks. If I wanted a handheld gaming device I'd buy a PSP. I'll still take my Nexus over any phone that's out now.
     
  26. zsdersw

    zsdersw Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    10,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly.