• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Next version of Win Amp. WinAmp 8?

F

FrustratedUser

Lifer
So, will next version of WinAmp be called WinAmp 8?
It makes sense if you look at how they've numbered it so far.

1
2
3 (1+2)
5 (2+3)
8? (3+5)

Your take on this very important question.
😀
 
Do you know why it was 5 though? To combine good stuff from 2 and 3, next should be 6, maybe a new naming scheme all together though
 
If you say they just skipped 4, then winamp 6 or winamp 7 are possible, depending on if they skip a number again or not. Maybe they wanted to get an extra number away from 3 since Winamp 3 was garbage.
 
Originally posted by: Elitebull
maybe they'll call it WinampOne or WinampCS 😉
Click to expand...

lol, yeah what is it with those naming schemes?!
or just slapping on an "XP" at the end.
 
I thought fibonacci too...but it's not true to the sequence
1
1
2
3
5
8
13
21
34

etc. notice the 1, then 1 again. that's vital to the way it works. you can't just all of the sudden decide to start a pattern on the 3rd term and not the second...unless the equation is recursive and says t sub 1 = 1, t sub 2 = 2, t sub 3 = tsub n-2 + tsub n-1

are you confused? I am.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top