Next version of Win Amp. WinAmp 8?

[FrustratedUser]

So, will next version of WinAmp be called WinAmp 8?
It makes sense if you look at how they've numbered it so far.

1
2
3 (1+2)
5 (2+3)
8? (3+5)

Your take on this very important question.

 

[Nohr]

I'm still using 2, wtf do I care?

 

[AgaBoogaBoo]

Do you know why it was 5 though? To combine good stuff from 2 and 3, next should be 6, maybe a new naming scheme all together though

 

[Nick5324]

If you say they just skipped 4, then winamp 6 or winamp 7 are possible, depending on if they skip a number again or not. Maybe they wanted to get an extra number away from 3 since Winamp 3 was garbage.

 

[FrustratedUser]

7 would be possible if they take a good version (2) and add another good version (5).

 

[slydecix]

maybe they'll call it WinampOne or WinampCS

 

[zimu]

Originally posted by: Elitebull
maybe they'll call it WinampOne or WinampCS

lol, yeah what is it with those naming schemes?!
or just slapping on an "XP" at the end.

 

[Yzzim]

Winamp5.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999......

 

[TitanDiddly]

5 = 2 on crack

3 = teh suck

 

[WinkOsmosis]

Fibonacci? After 8 is 13. Then 21.

 

[TheBoyBlunder]

Originally posted by: Nohr
I'm still using 2, wtf do I care?

 

[Dufman]

Originally posted by: Nohr
I'm still using 2, wtf do I care?

2.71 is teh BOMB!

 

[GhettoFob]

Winamp ME :Q

 

[EMPshockwave82]

Originally posted by: GhettoFob
Winamp ME :Q

dont ever say something like that... you could get your mouth washed out with soap

 

[silverpig]

Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Fibonacci? After 8 is 13. Then 21.

:beer:

 

[Bv3]

Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Fibonacci? After 8 is 13. Then 21.

That's the first thing I thought of too. I'm such a nerd!

 

[Freejack2]

Introducing Winamp69 with porn popup technology.
For adults only.

 

[FrustratedUser]

Originally posted by: Freejack2
Introducing Winamp69 with porn popup technology.
For adults only.

IE?

 

[Reliant]

Originally posted by: Nohr
I'm still using 2, wtf do I care?

 

[TaylorMaC692]

I thought fibonacci too...but it's not true to the sequence
1
1
2
3
5
8
13
21
34

etc. notice the 1, then 1 again. that's vital to the way it works. you can't just all of the sudden decide to start a pattern on the 3rd term and not the second...unless the equation is recursive and says t sub 1 = 1, t sub 2 = 2, t sub 3 = tsub n-2 + tsub n-1

are you confused? I am.

 

[Sid59]

winamp should die or merge with Real PLayer.

 

[MithShrike]

I most certainly do like 5. It is quite nice.