Next Bailout after this Bailout

GTKeeper

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,118
0
0
So I have been watching Charlie Rose on PBS last few nights (btw, Warren Buffett will be on tonight) and he had Martin Feldstein on. MF was an economic advisor to Reagan and he is an economic expert.

He brought up a very good point and something that unfortuntetly the government will not be thinking about.

The main issue for the next 2-3 years will be the fact that the housing market and house prices will OVERSHOOT on the bottom. And instead of (for argument's sake) having 10 million homes be upside down today, we might end up with 20-25 million homes.

Now his main point is that the fundemental problem of today is that house prices are continuing to decline which will trigger more problems for the financial markets. The main reason for that is that mortgages are non-recoverable loans, meaning a bank can take your house, but they cannot force you to sell your car (or other assets) to pay them back. Now, if some houses end up being 20, 30 or 40% upside down there will be a bigger incentive for people to simply walk away from their house leaving the bank holding the mortgage.


What Feldstein proposes (and I agree with this) is that the government needs to offer some kind of relief for all mortages or at least make the option available. His personal take on this, is that up to 80k or 20% of your total house value or mortgage could be 'swapped' with the government at a much lower interest rate.

Now, the government loan will be a recoverable loan (much like student loans that you can never get rid of) and would be given at a very nice interest rate.

What this does is 3 things

1) It would significantly lower monthly payments for a lot of families
2) People would have less of an incentive to 'walk away' from their house since they are on the hook forever for the 20% of it
3) Hopefully the overshooting of the housing market on the bottom will be a lot smaller


I wonder what people think of this, I think its a very sound plan.


 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
One problem: Those at greatest risk of doing this will be the least likely to opt for the government swap of 20% putting them on the hook. I'd wouldn't do it because I'm locked at a pretty low rate, so no gain to me. So, those locked in at low rates would be fools to do it (I wouldn't commit to 20% of my home's value forever just to save a point). Those with screwed rates probably wouldn't be saved by a slight reduction on merely 20% of their loan.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
So you're proposing that the government become a mortgage lender? And you're FOR the bailout proposal as well?
 

GTKeeper

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,118
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
One problem: Those at greatest risk of doing this will be the least likely to opt for the government swap of 20% putting them on the hook. I'd wouldn't do it because I'm locked at a pretty low rate, so no gain to me. So, those locked in at low rates would be fools to do it (I wouldn't commit to 20% of my home's value forever just to save a point). Those with screwed rates probably wouldn't be saved by a slight reduction on merely 20% of their loan.

Well, this isn't for the people with low rates already. This is for people that will get their rate lowered.

I think you are assuming that 90% of the loans out there are locked in at ridiculously low rates.... That's not the case.