Originally posted by: TankGuys
Originally posted by: apoppin
they HAVE to . . . otherwise they would get in legal trouble with the brands they carry [and the ad dollars they get] because of posting anonymous negative opinion from customers and [competing brands pretending to be customers].
They give their own reviews a FWIW. They are pretty upfront about their policy of not posting negative customer reviews . . . i think you can find it in their FAQ. Do a "search" here . . . i posted that link not too long ago in an identical thread.
if you want 'real' reviews, hang out here.
I think filtering the reviews renders them completely pointless. Obviously, it's one thing to filter for offense material and whatnot, but if a customer posts a negative review about a product, I'd leave it up. Stores filter them because they figure negative reviews will stop that product from selling. Is that a bad thing?? If a customer buys it and finds out it's crap, they are ticked and send it back. That doesn't help anybody.
I'd leave the bad reviews. If the product is garbage, and we get lots of bad reviews, we stop selling it. Why even sell something if it's that bad anyway? Finally, if a manufacturer complains about the bad reviews and threatens legal action of some sort, the answer is that you take the reviews off, AND the product.
Doens't that make a heck of a lot more sense?