- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,587
- 10,225
- 126
But then again, maybe this is another indication of worldwide Bilderberg manipulation.
I don't think Newegg is using stock photos. Various makes of memory seem to have identical "poses", but the modules are different.Originally posted by: Gillbot
It's Cas 5, it says so F2-8500CL5
I fail to see the issue really. If they use a stock photo, they can use the same image across multiple parts so of course they would need to obscure certain things.
Originally posted by: Gillbot
What I mean is, sometimes I see what could be the same picture across a line of products. For instance if they have a set of ram that's CL5 2.1v vs one that's CL5 at 1.8v. They use the same picture but blur out specs that may cause confusion.
That's done automatically by AnandTech's servers.Originally posted by: AdamK47
A bit off topic, but why do the Newegg links redirect through a marketing site?
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: Gillbot
What I mean is, sometimes I see what could be the same picture across a line of products. For instance if they have a set of ram that's CL5 2.1v vs one that's CL5 at 1.8v. They use the same picture but blur out specs that may cause confusion.
That's pretty lame. They certainly aren't hurting for image server space, are they? They should take seperate pictures for each type of RAM, and not blur out the specifications, that way we can verify that Newegg's printed specs are the same as the product's spec labels.
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: Gillbot
What I mean is, sometimes I see what could be the same picture across a line of products. For instance if they have a set of ram that's CL5 2.1v vs one that's CL5 at 1.8v. They use the same picture but blur out specs that may cause confusion.
That's pretty lame. They certainly aren't hurting for image server space, are they? They should take seperate pictures for each type of RAM, and not blur out the specifications, that way we can verify that Newegg's printed specs are the same as the product's spec labels.
Originally posted by: RebateMonger
That's done automatically by AnandTech's servers.Originally posted by: AdamK47
A bit off topic, but why do the Newegg links redirect through a marketing site?
Obviously I've hit the nail on the head, because nobody else is talking about a possible Bilderberg plot.Originally posted by: Old Hippie
But then again, maybe this is another indication of worldwide Bilderberg manipulation.
:laugh: That's great!
They've probably had problems with some Chowder Heads trying to use that stuff for rebates or RMAs or whatever.
But then again, maybe Blain's right about that conspiracy thing! :laugh:
Are you a shill for the Bilderberger's? :roll:Originally posted by: Swivelguy2
They're contracting their photo taking out to somebody and telling them to blur out the serial numbers (so that you can't complain that the item you received was opened to take the photos), and those people don't know the difference between serial numbers and latency numbers. And sometimes they just get excited with the blur tool.
Originally posted by: Old Hippie
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: Gillbot
What I mean is, sometimes I see what could be the same picture across a line of products. For instance if they have a set of ram that's CL5 2.1v vs one that's CL5 at 1.8v. They use the same picture but blur out specs that may cause confusion.
That's pretty lame. They certainly aren't hurting for image server space, are they? They should take seperate pictures for each type of RAM, and not blur out the specifications, that way we can verify that Newegg's printed specs are the same as the product's spec labels.
OK, then how 'bout they put the famous "This may not depict the actual product" disclaimer?
Yes, it is...Originally posted by: Yellowbeard
Originally posted by: Old Hippie
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: Gillbot
What I mean is, sometimes I see what could be the same picture across a line of products. For instance if they have a set of ram that's CL5 2.1v vs one that's CL5 at 1.8v. They use the same picture but blur out specs that may cause confusion.
That's pretty lame. They certainly aren't hurting for image server space, are they? They should take seperate pictures for each type of RAM, and not blur out the specifications, that way we can verify that Newegg's printed specs are the same as the product's spec labels.
OK, then how 'bout they put the famous "This may not depict the actual product" disclaimer?
I'm sure that's on the site somewhere.
But the specs are often wrong, which is why I like to look at the picture.Originally posted by: Gillbot
No, but why do they need to take picture after picture of a product when one can cover an entire line? I really don't see the need for them to need to do that really. READ the specs and don't rely on a picture.
Originally posted by: Blain
Yes, it is...
Newegg:
"Due to human error and other determinates we cannot guarantee that all item descriptions, photographs, compatibility references, detailed specifications, pricing, links and any other product-related information listed is entirely accurate, complete or current, nor can we assume responsibility for these errors."
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
But the specs are often wrong, which is why I like to look at the picture.Originally posted by: Gillbot
No, but why do they need to take picture after picture of a product when one can cover an entire line? I really don't see the need for them to need to do that really. READ the specs and don't rely on a picture.