New York Times Review of Canon S95

[speedy2]

http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/a-love-letter-to-a-camera/?nl=technology&emc=cta2

 

[rivan]

Here's a review that isn't a tongue-in-cheek infomercial.

http://www.steves-digicams.com/camera-reviews/canon/powershot-s95/canon-powershot-s95-review.html

(and wow, they've really crammed on the "buy here" stuff on Steve's)

 

[corkyg]

Both reviews, however, are in agreement. One is written for non-geeks and the other for geeks. Seems to be good value.

Yeah - "buy here" ads are prevalent, but - that's what pays for the site.

 

[speedy2]

I just got the S95 and agree with the reviews. Pretty capable camera. I still miss my 40D though.

 

[crisscross]

I am debating between this and the Panasonic LX5K. Granted the Panasonic is $100 more but I am wondering if it can fill in for a camcorder as well?

 

[olds]

Wife just picked this camera up a few weeks ago. It's a great little camera and does well in low light.